Re: [PATCH 03/12] xfs: fix a comment typo in xfs_submit_ioend

[Darrick J. Wong]

On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 07:52:44AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The fail argument is long gone, update the comment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Looks ok,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index 9cceb90e77c5..dc60aec0c5a7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ xfs_map_blocks(
>   * reference to the ioend to ensure that the ioend completion is only done once
>   * all bios have been submitted and the ioend is really done.
>   *
> - * If @fail is non-zero, it means that we have a situation where some part of
> + * If @status is non-zero, it means that we have a situation where some part of
>   * the submission process has failed after we have marked paged for writeback
>   * and unlocked them. In this situation, we need to fail the bio and ioend
>   * rather than submit it to IO. This typically only happens on a filesystem
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>