Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov

[Viresh Kumar]

On 24-06-19, 22:00, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> All of the cases above are some real world scenarios I've come across.
> CPU and L2/L3 on ARM systems are a good example of (2) but the passive
> governor doesn't work with CPUs yet. But I plan to work on that later
> as that's not related to this patch series.

So in case of CPUs, the cache will be the parent device and CPU be the
children ? And CPUs nodes will contain the required-opps property ?

-- 
viresh