Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the tip tree

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Wed Jun 26 2019 - 01:19:12 EST

Next message: Alex Ghiti: "Re: [PATCH RESEND 6/8] parisc: Use mmap_base, not mmap_legacy_base, as low_limit for bottom-up mmap"
Previous message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the tip tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> 53d87b37a2a4 ("arm64: compat: No need for pre-ARMv7 barriers on an ARMv8 system")
> b4b12aca00d5 ("arm64: vdso: Remove unnecessary asm-offsets.c definitions")
> 4d33ebb02c45 ("vdso: Remove superfluous #ifdef __KERNEL__ in vdso/datapage.h")
>
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.

Oops.

Next message: Alex Ghiti: "Re: [PATCH RESEND 6/8] parisc: Use mmap_base, not mmap_legacy_base, as low_limit for bottom-up mmap"
Previous message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the tip tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]