Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Support accelerometers for veyron_minnie

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 22:40:00 +0200
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> On 26/6/19 21:21, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:09:50 +0200
> > Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 25/6/19 0:53, Gwendal Grignou wrote:  
> >>> veyron_minnie - ASUS Chromebook Flip C100PA - embedded controller
> >>> controls two accelerometers, one in the lid, one in the base.
> >>> However, the EC firmware does not follow the new interface that
> >>> cros_ec_accel driver use.
> >>> Extend the legacy driver used on glimmer - Lenovo ThinkPad 11e
> >>> Chromebook - to veyron_minnie.
> >>> veyron_minnie being ARM based, issue command over the I2C bus to the EC
> >>> instead of relying on the shared registers over LPC.
> >>>
> >>> Gwendal Grignou (2):
> >>>   iio: cros_ec: Add sign vector in core for backward compatibility
> >>>   iio: cros_ec: Extend legacy support to ARM device
> >>>
> >>> Changes in v3:
> >>> - Fix commit message, add reviewed-by for first patch.
> >>>
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>> - Readd empty line to reduce amount of change in patch.
> >>> - Remove Keywords used by ChromeOS commit queue.
> >>>
> >>>  drivers/iio/accel/Kconfig                     |   4 +-
> >>>  drivers/iio/accel/cros_ec_accel_legacy.c      | 350 ++++--------------
> >>>  .../cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c    |   4 +
> >>>  .../linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h   |   1 +
> >>>  4 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 275 deletions(-)
> >>>     
> >>
> >> Just a side note that I think that this patch depends on [1] to have the legacy
> >> sensors working on veyron minnie.
> >>
> >> For the full series:
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
> > Ah. I was assuming you mean a runtime dependency.  Whereas applying this
> > on it's own is giving me a build problem:
> > 
> >  drivers/iio/accel/cros_ec_accel_legacy.c: In function âcros_ec_accel_legacy_read_cmdâ:
> > drivers/iio/accel/cros_ec_accel_legacy.c:50:16: error: âstruct <anonymous>â has no member named âmax_sensor_countâ  
> 
> Right, this also build depends on the immutable branch (ib-mfd-cros-v5.3).
Ah. I'd forgotten about that set.

> 
> 
> >    50 |  st->param.dump.max_sensor_count = CROS_EC_SENSOR_LEGACY_NUM;
> >       |                ^
> > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:285: drivers/iio/accel/cros_ec_accel_legacy.o] Error 1
> > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:489: drivers/iio/accel] Error 2
> > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:489: drivers/iio] Error 2
> > 
> > Which I'll assume is related to that other set.
> > 
> > I'm happy for these to go another route to sit on top of that series.
> > If not I'll pick them up for the next cycle via IIO.
> > 
> > Should they go another route,
> > 
> > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> for both of them.  
> 
> I'd be happy to pick this patch and add to the chrome-platform tree, ideally
> once we manage to get [1] ready for land.
Let's go with that.  If you change your mind, let me know.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> Thanks,
> ~ Enric
> 
> >   
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/18/268  
> >