Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: pinctrl: aspeed: Convert AST2400 bindings to json-schema

[Andrew Jeffery]

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019, at 23:17, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 1:21 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Convert ASPEED pinctrl bindings to DT schema format using json-schema
> 
> BTW, ASPEED is one of the remaining platforms needing the top-level
> board bindings converted.

Okay, I'll put together patches to fix that.

> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.txt        | 80 -------------------
> >  .../pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml       | 73 +++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.txt
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml
> 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..3b8cf3e51506
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> 
> Do you have rights to change the license?

Where are you coming from with this question? The bindings previously didn't list a
license, is there some implicit license for them? I would have thought it was GPL-2.0?
IBM's (my employer's) preferred contribution license is GPL 2.0-or-later, so I was just
adding the SPDX marker to clarify.

> If so, the preference is to
> dual license with (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause).

You're asking if I have the power to relicense so I can dual license it this way?

> 
> BTW, '-or-later' is the preferred form over '+'.

Thanks for the pointer.

> 
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: ASPEED AST2400 Pin Controller
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    oneOf:
> > +      - items:
> > +        - enum:
> > +          - aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl
> > +      - items:
> > +        - enum:
> > +          - aspeed,g4-pinctrl
> 
> This can be simplified to:
> 
> compatible:
>   enum:
>     - aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl
>     - aspeed,g4-pinctrl

Ah, that makes more sense, I think I was thrown by some details of the example.

> 
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +
> > +description: |+
> 
> description goes before properties.

Okay. I wouldn't have thought the ordering mattered. Is this just a preference?
The tools seemed to run fine as is.

I'll re-order it regardless.

> 
> > +  The pin controller node should be the child of a syscon node with the
> > +  required property:
> > +
> > +  - compatible:     Should be one of the following:
> > +                    "aspeed,ast2400-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
> > +                    "aspeed,g4-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
> > +
> > +  Refer to the the bindings described in
> > +  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.txt
> > +
> > +  For the AST2400 pinmux, each mux function has only one associated pin group.
> > +  Each group is named by its function. The following values for the function
> > +  and groups properties are supported:
> > +
> > +  ACPI ADC0 ADC1 ADC10 ADC11 ADC12 ADC13 ADC14 ADC15 ADC2 ADC3 ADC4 ADC5 ADC6
> > +  ADC7 ADC8 ADC9 BMCINT DDCCLK DDCDAT EXTRST FLACK FLBUSY FLWP GPID GPID0 GPID2
> > +  GPID4 GPID6 GPIE0 GPIE2 GPIE4 GPIE6 I2C10 I2C11 I2C12 I2C13 I2C14 I2C3 I2C4
> > +  I2C5 I2C6 I2C7 I2C8 I2C9 LPCPD LPCPME LPCRST LPCSMI MAC1LINK MAC2LINK MDIO1
> > +  MDIO2 NCTS1 NCTS2 NCTS3 NCTS4 NDCD1 NDCD2 NDCD3 NDCD4 NDSR1 NDSR2 NDSR3 NDSR4
> > +  NDTR1 NDTR2 NDTR3 NDTR4 NDTS4 NRI1 NRI2 NRI3 NRI4 NRTS1 NRTS2 NRTS3 OSCCLK
> > +  PWM0 PWM1 PWM2 PWM3 PWM4 PWM5 PWM6 PWM7 RGMII1 RGMII2 RMII1 RMII2 ROM16 ROM8
> > +  ROMCS1 ROMCS2 ROMCS3 ROMCS4 RXD1 RXD2 RXD3 RXD4 SALT1 SALT2 SALT3 SALT4 SD1
> > +  SD2 SGPMCK SGPMI SGPMLD SGPMO SGPSCK SGPSI0 SGPSI1 SGPSLD SIOONCTRL SIOPBI
> > +  SIOPBO SIOPWREQ SIOPWRGD SIOS3 SIOS5 SIOSCI SPI1 SPI1DEBUG SPI1PASSTHRU
> > +  SPICS1 TIMER3 TIMER4 TIMER5 TIMER6 TIMER7 TIMER8 TXD1 TXD2 TXD3 TXD4 UART6
> > +  USB11D1 USB11H2 USB2D1 USB2H1 USBCKI VGABIOS_ROM VGAHS VGAVS VPI18 VPI24
> > +  VPI30 VPO12 VPO24 WDTRST1 WDTRST2
> 
> This should be a schema. 

Yeah, I covered this in my cover letter. I was hoping to get away without
that for the moment as this seems like the first pinctrl binding to be
converted, however if you insist...

> You need to define child nodes and list these
> as values for 'function' and 'group'. Ideally, the child nodes would
> have some sort of pattern, but if not, you can just match on '^.*$'
> under patternProperties.
> 
> BTW, You can put the names under a 'definitions' key and then use
> '$ref' to reference them from function and group to avoid duplicating
> the names. Or use patternProperties with '^(function|group)$'.

Okay, I'll take some time to digest this while looking at the documentation.

> 
> Similar comments apply to AST2500 binding.

Yes, will fix that too.

Thanks for the prompt review!

Andrew