Re: [bpf/tools] cd17d77705: kernel_selftests.bpf.test_sock_addr.sh.fail

From: Stanislav Fomichev
Date: Thu Jun 27 2019 - 13:29:36 EST

Next message: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] x86/vsyscall: Change the default vsyscall mode to xonly"
Previous message: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] selftests/x86/vsyscall: Verify that vsyscall=none blocks execution"
In reply to: Stanislav Fomichev: "Re: [bpf/tools] cd17d77705: kernel_selftests.bpf.test_sock_addr.sh.fail"
Next in thread: Andrii Nakryiko: "Re: [bpf/tools] cd17d77705: kernel_selftests.bpf.test_sock_addr.sh.fail"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 06/27, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 06/27, kernel test robot wrote:
> > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):
> >
> > commit: cd17d77705780e2270937fb3cbd2b985adab3edc ("bpf/tools: sync bpf.h")
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> >
> > in testcase: kernel_selftests
> > with following parameters:
> >
> > group: kselftests-00
> >
> > test-description: The kernel contains a set of "self tests" under the tools/testing/selftests/ directory. These are intended to be small unit tests to exercise individual code paths in the kernel.
> > test-url: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kselftest.txt
> >
> >
> > on test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 8G
> >
> > caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
> >
> > # ; int connect_v6_prog(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
> > # 0: (bf) r6 = r1
> > # 1: (18) r1 = 0x100000000000000
> > # ; tuple.ipv6.daddr[0] = bpf_htonl(DST_REWRITE_IP6_0);
> > # 3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r1
> > # 4: (b7) r1 = 169476096
> > # ; memset(&tuple.ipv6.sport, 0, sizeof(tuple.ipv6.sport));
> > # 5: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -8) = r1
> > # 6: (b7) r7 = 0
> > # ; tuple.ipv6.daddr[0] = bpf_htonl(DST_REWRITE_IP6_0);
> > # 7: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -24) = r7
> > # 8: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -32) = r7
> > # 9: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -40) = r7
> > # ; if (ctx->type != SOCK_STREAM && ctx->type != SOCK_DGRAM)
> > # 10: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r6 +32)
> > # ; if (ctx->type != SOCK_STREAM && ctx->type != SOCK_DGRAM)
> > # 11: (bf) r2 = r1
> > # 12: (07) r2 += -1
> > # 13: (67) r2 <<= 32
> > # 14: (77) r2 >>= 32
> > # 15: (25) if r2 > 0x1 goto pc+33
> > # R1=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2=inv(id=0,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1)) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R7=inv0 R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=????mmmm fp-16=mmmmmmmm fp-24=00000000 fp-32=00000000 fp-40=00000000
> > # ; else if (ctx->type == SOCK_STREAM)
> > # 16: (55) if r1 != 0x1 goto pc+8
> > # R1=inv1 R2=inv(id=0,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1)) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R7=inv0 R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=????mmmm fp-16=mmmmmmmm fp-24=00000000 fp-32=00000000 fp-40=00000000
> > # 17: (bf) r2 = r10
> > # ; sk = bpf_sk_lookup_tcp(ctx, &tuple, sizeof(tuple.ipv6),
> > # 18: (07) r2 += -40
> > # 19: (bf) r1 = r6
> > # 20: (b7) r3 = 36
> > # 21: (b7) r4 = -1
> > # 22: (b7) r5 = 0
> > # 23: (85) call bpf_sk_lookup_tcp#84
> > # 24: (05) goto pc+7
> > # ; if (!sk)
> > # 32: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+16
> > # R0=sock(id=0,ref_obj_id=2,off=0,imm=0) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R7=inv0 R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=????mmmm fp-16=mmmmmmmm fp-24=mmmmmmmm fp-32=mmmmmmmm fp-40=mmmmmmmm refs=2
> > # ; if (sk->src_ip6[0] != tuple.ipv6.daddr[0] ||
> > # 33: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r0 +28)
> > # ; if (sk->src_ip6[0] != tuple.ipv6.daddr[0] ||
> > # 34: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r10 -24)
> > # ; if (sk->src_ip6[0] != tuple.ipv6.daddr[0] ||
> > # 35: (5d) if r1 != r2 goto pc+11
> > # R0=sock(id=0,ref_obj_id=2,off=0,imm=0) R1=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R7=inv0 R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=????mmmm fp-16=mmmmmmmm fp-24=mmmmmmmm fp-32=mmmmmmmm fp-40=mmmmmmmm refs=2
> > # ; sk->src_ip6[1] != tuple.ipv6.daddr[1] ||
> > # 36: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r0 +32)
> > # ; sk->src_ip6[1] != tuple.ipv6.daddr[1] ||
> > # 37: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r10 -20)
> > # ; sk->src_ip6[1] != tuple.ipv6.daddr[1] ||
> > # 38: (5d) if r1 != r2 goto pc+8
> > # R0=sock(id=0,ref_obj_id=2,off=0,imm=0) R1=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R7=inv0 R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=????mmmm fp-16=mmmmmmmm fp-24=mmmmmmmm fp-32=mmmmmmmm fp-40=mmmmmmmm refs=2
> > # ; sk->src_ip6[2] != tuple.ipv6.daddr[2] ||
> > # 39: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r0 +36)
> > # ; sk->src_ip6[2] != tuple.ipv6.daddr[2] ||
> > # 40: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r10 -16)
> > # ; sk->src_ip6[2] != tuple.ipv6.daddr[2] ||
> > # 41: (5d) if r1 != r2 goto pc+5
> > # R0=sock(id=0,ref_obj_id=2,off=0,imm=0) R1=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R7=inv0 R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=????mmmm fp-16=mmmmmmmm fp-24=mmmmmmmm fp-32=mmmmmmmm fp-40=mmmmmmmm refs=2
> > # ; sk->src_ip6[3] != tuple.ipv6.daddr[3] ||
> > # 42: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r0 +40)
> > # ; sk->src_ip6[3] != tuple.ipv6.daddr[3] ||
> > # 43: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r10 -12)
> > # ; sk->src_ip6[3] != tuple.ipv6.daddr[3] ||
> > # 44: (5d) if r1 != r2 goto pc+2
> > # R0=sock(id=0,ref_obj_id=2,off=0,imm=0) R1=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R7=inv0 R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=????mmmm fp-16=mmmmmmmm fp-24=mmmmmmmm fp-32=mmmmmmmm fp-40=mmmmmmmm refs=2
> > # ; sk->src_port != DST_REWRITE_PORT6) {
> > # 45: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r0 +44)
> > # ; if (sk->src_ip6[0] != tuple.ipv6.daddr[0] ||
> > # 46: (15) if r1 == 0x1a0a goto pc+4
> > # R0=sock(id=0,ref_obj_id=2,off=0,imm=0) R1=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R7=inv0 R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=????mmmm fp-16=mmmmmmmm fp-24=mmmmmmmm fp-32=mmmmmmmm fp-40=mmmmmmmm refs=2
> > # ; bpf_sk_release(sk);
> > # 47: (bf) r1 = r0
> > # 48: (85) call bpf_sk_release#86
> > # ; }
> > # 49: (bf) r0 = r7
> > # 50: (95) exit
> > #
> > # from 46 to 51: R0=sock(id=0,ref_obj_id=2,off=0,imm=0) R1=inv6666 R2=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R7=inv0 R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=????mmmm fp-16=mmmmmmmm fp-24=mmmmmmmm fp-32=mmmmmmmm fp-40=mmmmmmmm refs=2
> > # ; bpf_sk_release(sk);
> > # 51: (bf) r1 = r0
> > # 52: (85) call bpf_sk_release#86
> > # 53: (b7) r1 = 2586
> > # ; ctx->user_port = bpf_htons(DST_REWRITE_PORT6);
> > # 54: (63) *(u32 *)(r6 +24) = r1
> > # 55: (18) r1 = 0x100000000000000
> > # ; ctx->user_ip6[2] = bpf_htonl(DST_REWRITE_IP6_2);
> > # 57: (7b) *(u64 *)(r6 +16) = r1
> > # invalid bpf_context access off=16 size=8
> This looks like clang doing single u64 write for user_ip6[2] and
> user_ip6[3] instead of two u32. I don't think we allow that.
>
> I've seen this a couple of times myself while playing with some
> progs, but not sure what's the right way to 'fix' it.
>
Any thoughts about the patch below? Another way to "fix" it
would be to mark context accesses 'volatile' in bpf progs, but that sounds
a bit gross.

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 43b45d6db36d..34a14c950e60 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -746,6 +746,20 @@ bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(u32 off, u32 size, u32 size_default)
return size <= size_default && (size & (size - 1)) == 0;
}

+static inline bool __bpf_ctx_wide_store_ok(u32 off, u32 size)
+{
+ /* u64 access is aligned and fits into the field size */
+ return off % sizeof(__u64) == 0 && off + sizeof(__u64) <= size;
+}
+
+#define bpf_ctx_wide_store_ok(off, size, type, field) \
+ (size == sizeof(__u64) && \
+ off >= offsetof(type, field) && \
+ off < offsetofend(type, field) ? \
+ __bpf_ctx_wide_store_ok(off - offsetof(type, field), \
+ FIELD_SIZEOF(type, field)) : 0)
+
+
#define bpf_classic_proglen(fprog) (fprog->len * sizeof(fprog->filter[0]))

static inline void bpf_prog_lock_ro(struct bpf_prog *fp)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 2014d76e0d2a..2d3787a439ae 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -6849,6 +6849,16 @@ static bool sock_addr_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
if (!bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(off, size, size_default))
return false;
} else {
+ if (bpf_ctx_wide_store_ok(off, size,
+ struct bpf_sock_addr,
+ user_ip6))
+ return true;
+
+ if (bpf_ctx_wide_store_ok(off, size,
+ struct bpf_sock_addr,
+ msg_src_ip6))
+ return true;
+
if (size != size_default)
return false;
}
@@ -7689,9 +7699,6 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
/* SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF() has semantic similar to
* SOCK_ADDR_LOAD_NESTED_FIELD_SIZE_OFF() but for store operation.
*
- * It doesn't support SIZE argument though since narrow stores are not
- * supported for now.
- *
* In addition it uses Temporary Field TF (member of struct S) as the 3rd
* "register" since two registers available in convert_ctx_access are not
* enough: we can't override neither SRC, since it contains value to store, nor
@@ -7699,7 +7706,7 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
* instructions. But we need a temporary place to save pointer to nested
* structure whose field we want to store to.
*/
-#define SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF(S, NS, F, NF, OFF, TF) \
+#define SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF(S, NS, F, NF, SIZE, OFF, TF) \
do { \
int tmp_reg = BPF_REG_9; \
if (si->src_reg == tmp_reg || si->dst_reg == tmp_reg) \
@@ -7710,8 +7717,7 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
offsetof(S, TF)); \
*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(S, F), tmp_reg, \
si->dst_reg, offsetof(S, F)); \
- *insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM( \
- BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(NS, NF), tmp_reg, si->src_reg, \
+ *insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(SIZE, tmp_reg, si->src_reg, \
bpf_target_off(NS, NF, FIELD_SIZEOF(NS, NF), \
target_size) \
+ OFF); \
@@ -7723,8 +7729,8 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
TF) \
do { \
if (type == BPF_WRITE) { \
- SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF(S, NS, F, NF, OFF, \
- TF); \
+ SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF(S, NS, F, NF, SIZE, \
+ OFF, TF); \
} else { \
SOCK_ADDR_LOAD_NESTED_FIELD_SIZE_OFF( \
S, NS, F, NF, SIZE, OFF); \

Next message: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] x86/vsyscall: Change the default vsyscall mode to xonly"
Previous message: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] selftests/x86/vsyscall: Verify that vsyscall=none blocks execution"
In reply to: Stanislav Fomichev: "Re: [bpf/tools] cd17d77705: kernel_selftests.bpf.test_sock_addr.sh.fail"
Next in thread: Andrii Nakryiko: "Re: [bpf/tools] cd17d77705: kernel_selftests.bpf.test_sock_addr.sh.fail"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]