Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] cpufreq: Remove the redundant !setpolicy check

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, June 20, 2019 5:05:46 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> cpufreq_start_governor() is only called for !setpolicy case, checking it
> again is not required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 85ff958e01f1..54befd775bd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2153,7 +2153,7 @@ static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  
>  	pr_debug("%s: for CPU %u\n", __func__, policy->cpu);
>  
> -	if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy)
> +	if (cpufreq_driver->get)
>  		cpufreq_update_current_freq(policy);
>  
>  	if (policy->governor->start) {
> 

Applied, thanks!