Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] cpufreq: qcom: Update the bandwidth levels on frequency change

From: Rajendra Nayak
Date: Fri Jun 28 2019 - 04:26:02 EST



On 6/27/2019 7:04 PM, Sibi Sankar wrote:
Add support to parse and update optional OPP tables attached to the
cpu nodes when the OPP bandwidth values are populated to enable
scaling of DDR/L3 bandwidth levels with frequency change.

Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
[]...

@@ -79,13 +108,29 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
{
u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_cc = 0, prev_freq = 0, freq;
u32 volt;
+ u64 rate;
unsigned int max_cores = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
+ struct device_node *opp_table_np, *np;
+ int ret;
table = kcalloc(LUT_MAX_ENTRIES + 1, sizeof(*table), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!table)
return -ENOMEM;
+ ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(cpu_dev);
+ if (!ret) {
+ /* Disable all opps and cross-validate against LUT */
+ opp_table_np = dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(cpu_dev);
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(opp_table_np, np) {
+ ret = of_property_read_u64(np, "opp-hz", &rate);
+ dev_pm_opp_disable(cpu_dev, rate);
+ }
+ of_node_put(opp_table_np);
+ } else {
+ dev_err(cpu_dev, "Couldn't add OPP table from dt\n");

The changelog seems to suggest specifying OPP tables in DT is optional,
but here we seem to error out if the tables are missing.

+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < LUT_MAX_ENTRIES; i++) {
data = readl_relaxed(base + REG_FREQ_LUT +
i * LUT_ROW_SIZE);
@@ -104,7 +149,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
if (freq != prev_freq && core_count == max_cores) {
table[i].frequency = freq;
- dev_pm_opp_add(cpu_dev, freq * 1000, volt);
+ qcom_cpufreq_update_opp(cpu_dev, freq, volt);
dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "index=%d freq=%d, core_count %d\n", i,
freq, core_count);
} else {
@@ -125,7 +170,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
if (prev_cc != max_cores) {
prev->frequency = prev_freq;
prev->flags = CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ;
- dev_pm_opp_add(cpu_dev, prev_freq * 1000, volt);
+ qcom_cpufreq_update_opp(cpu_dev, prev_freq,
+ volt);
}
break;
@@ -168,6 +214,7 @@ static void qcom_get_related_cpus(int index, struct cpumask *m)
static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct device *dev = &global_pdev->dev;
+ struct opp_table *opp_table = NULL;
struct of_phandle_args args;
struct device_node *cpu_np;
struct device *cpu_dev;
@@ -202,6 +249,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
if (!base)
return -ENOMEM;
+ opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_paths(cpu_dev);
+
/* HW should be in enabled state to proceed */
if (!(readl_relaxed(base + REG_ENABLE) & 0x1)) {
dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d cpufreq hardware not enabled\n", index);
@@ -237,6 +286,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return 0;
error:
+ if (opp_table)
+ dev_pm_opp_put_paths(opp_table);
devm_iounmap(dev, base);
return ret;
}
@@ -275,6 +326,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cpufreq_qcom_hw_driver = {
static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
+ struct opp_table *opp_table = NULL;
+ struct device *cpu_dev;
struct clk *clk;
int ret;
@@ -294,6 +347,26 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
global_pdev = pdev;
+ /* Check for optional interconnect paths on CPU0 */
+ cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(0);
+ if (!cpu_dev) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get cpu0 device\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_paths(cpu_dev);
+ if (IS_ERR(opp_table)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(opp_table);
+ if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
+ dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "defer icc set paths: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "set paths failed ddr/l3 scaling off: %d\n",
+ ret);

Here again, the interconnect paths don't seem to be optional as the comment
above suggests.

+ } else {
+ dev_pm_opp_put_paths(opp_table);
+ }
+
ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&cpufreq_qcom_hw_driver);
if (ret)
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CPUFreq HW driver failed to register\n");


--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation