Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: redefine PTRS_PER_PGD/PTRS_PER_PMD/PTRS_PER_PTE

[Paul Walmsley]

On Wed, 24 Apr 2019, damon wrote:

> Use the number of addresses to define the relevant macros.
> 
> Signed-off-by: damon <liush.damon@xxxxxxxxx>

This patch looks reasonable to me.  But what's missing from the 
description is the motivation.  Is this a prerequisite for another patch 
that you're planning to post?  Or because you think this is clearer than 
the original?  Or something else?  etc.


- Paul