On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:58:53 +0200,Thank you for you patch,
Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Shifting the integer value 1 is evaluated using 32-bit
arithmetic and then used in an expression that expects a 64-bit
value, so there is potentially an integer overflow. Fix this
by using the BIT_ULL macro to perform the shift.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The fix is correct, but luckily we didn't hit the integer overflow, as
all passed values are less than 32bit.
In anyway, applied now. Thanks.
Takashi
---_______________________________________________
sound/xen/xen_snd_front_alsa.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/xen/xen_snd_front_alsa.c b/sound/xen/xen_snd_front_alsa.c
index b14ab512c2ce..e01631959ed8 100644
--- a/sound/xen/xen_snd_front_alsa.c
+++ b/sound/xen/xen_snd_front_alsa.c
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static u64 to_sndif_formats_mask(u64 alsa_formats)
mask = 0;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ALSA_SNDIF_FORMATS); i++)
if (pcm_format_to_bits(ALSA_SNDIF_FORMATS[i].alsa) & alsa_formats)
- mask |= 1 << ALSA_SNDIF_FORMATS[i].sndif;
+ mask |= BIT_ULL(ALSA_SNDIF_FORMATS[i].sndif);
return mask;
}
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static u64 to_alsa_formats_mask(u64 sndif_formats)
mask = 0;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ALSA_SNDIF_FORMATS); i++)
- if (1 << ALSA_SNDIF_FORMATS[i].sndif & sndif_formats)
+ if (BIT_ULL(ALSA_SNDIF_FORMATS[i].sndif) & sndif_formats)
mask |= pcm_format_to_bits(ALSA_SNDIF_FORMATS[i].alsa);
return mask;
--
2.20.1
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel