Re: [PATCH v3] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Support per-burst residue granularity
From: Jon Hunter
Date: Tue Jul 02 2019 - 07:20:35 EST
On 27/06/2019 20:47, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Tegra's APB DMA engine updates words counter after each transferred burst
> of data, hence it can report transfer's residual with more fidelity which
> may be required in cases like audio playback. In particular this fixes
> audio stuttering during playback in a chromium web browser. The patch is
> based on the original work that was made by Ben Dooks and a patch from
> downstream kernel. It was tested on Tegra20 and Tegra30 devices.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190424162348.23692-1-ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Link: https://nv-tegra.nvidia.com/gitweb/?p=linux-4.4.git;a=commit;h=c7bba40c6846fbf3eaad35c4472dcc7d8bbc02e5
> Inspired-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changelog:
>
> v3: Added workaround for a hardware design shortcoming that results
> in a words counter wraparound before end-of-transfer bit is set
> in a cyclic mode.
>
> v2: Addressed review comments made by Jon Hunter to v1. We won't try
> to get words count if dma_desc is on free list as it will result
> in a NULL dereference because this case wasn't handled properly.
>
> The residual value is now updated properly, avoiding potential
> integer overflow by adding the "bytes" to the "bytes_transferred"
> instead of the subtraction.
>
> drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
> index 79e9593815f1..71473eda28ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
> @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ struct tegra_dma_sg_req {
> bool last_sg;
> struct list_head node;
> struct tegra_dma_desc *dma_desc;
> + unsigned int words_xferred;
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -496,6 +497,7 @@ static void tegra_dma_configure_for_next(struct tegra_dma_channel *tdc,
> tdc_write(tdc, TEGRA_APBDMA_CHAN_CSR,
> nsg_req->ch_regs.csr | TEGRA_APBDMA_CSR_ENB);
> nsg_req->configured = true;
> + nsg_req->words_xferred = 0;
>
> tegra_dma_resume(tdc);
> }
> @@ -511,6 +513,7 @@ static void tdc_start_head_req(struct tegra_dma_channel *tdc)
> typeof(*sg_req), node);
> tegra_dma_start(tdc, sg_req);
> sg_req->configured = true;
> + sg_req->words_xferred = 0;
> tdc->busy = true;
> }
>
> @@ -797,6 +800,61 @@ static int tegra_dma_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *dc)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static unsigned int tegra_dma_sg_bytes_xferred(struct tegra_dma_channel *tdc,
> + struct tegra_dma_sg_req *sg_req)
> +{
> + unsigned long status, wcount = 0;
> +
> + if (!list_is_first(&sg_req->node, &tdc->pending_sg_req))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (tdc->tdma->chip_data->support_separate_wcount_reg)
> + wcount = tdc_read(tdc, TEGRA_APBDMA_CHAN_WORD_TRANSFER);
> +
> + status = tdc_read(tdc, TEGRA_APBDMA_CHAN_STATUS);
> +
> + if (!tdc->tdma->chip_data->support_separate_wcount_reg)
> + wcount = status;
> +
> + if (status & TEGRA_APBDMA_STATUS_ISE_EOC)
> + return sg_req->req_len;
> +
> + wcount = get_current_xferred_count(tdc, sg_req, wcount);
> +
> + if (!wcount) {
> + /*
> + * If wcount wasn't ever polled for this SG before, then
> + * simply assume that transfer hasn't started yet.
> + *
> + * Otherwise it's the end of the transfer.
> + *
> + * The alternative would be to poll the status register
> + * until EOC bit is set or wcount goes UP. That's so
> + * because EOC bit is getting set only after the last
> + * burst's completion and counter is less than the actual
> + * transfer size by 4 bytes. The counter value wraps around
> + * in a cyclic mode before EOC is set(!), so we can't easily
> + * distinguish start of transfer from its end.
> + */
> + if (sg_req->words_xferred)
> + wcount = sg_req->req_len - 4;
> +
> + } else if (wcount < sg_req->words_xferred) {
> + /*
> + * This case shall not ever happen because EOC bit
> + * must be set once next cyclic transfer is started.
I am not sure I follow this and why this condition cannot happen for
cyclic transfers. What about non-cyclic transfers?
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic