Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] RISC-V: Handle the siginfo_t offset problem

From: Andreas Schwab
Date: Wed Jul 03 2019 - 03:13:36 EST

Next message: Gao Xiang: "Re: [PATCH] staging: erofs: fix LZ4 limited bounced page mis-reuse"
Previous message: tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner: "[tip:core/stacktrace] stacktrace: Use PF_KTHREAD to check for kernel threads"
In reply to: Alistair Francis: "[PATCH RESEND 2/2] riscv/include/uapi: Define a custom __SIGINFO struct for RV32"
Next in thread: Alistair Francis: "Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] RISC-V: Handle the siginfo_t offset problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Jul 02 2019, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> In the RISC-V 32-bit glibc port [1] the siginfo_t struct in the kernel
> doesn't line up with the struct in glibc. In glibc world the _sifields
> union is 8 byte alligned (although I can't figure out why)

Try ptype/o in gdb.

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@xxxxxxx
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."

Next message: Gao Xiang: "Re: [PATCH] staging: erofs: fix LZ4 limited bounced page mis-reuse"
Previous message: tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner: "[tip:core/stacktrace] stacktrace: Use PF_KTHREAD to check for kernel threads"
In reply to: Alistair Francis: "[PATCH RESEND 2/2] riscv/include/uapi: Define a custom __SIGINFO struct for RV32"
Next in thread: Alistair Francis: "Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] RISC-V: Handle the siginfo_t offset problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]