Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: add binding for the Lantiq VRX200 and ARX300 PCIe PHYs

[Martin Blumenstingl]

Hi Rob,

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:34 AM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:35 PM Martin Blumenstingl
> <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Add the bindings for the PCIe PHY on Lantiq VRX200 and ARX300 SoCs.
> > The IP block contains settings for the PHY and a PLL.
> > The PLL mode is configurable through a dedicated #phy-cell in .dts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml  | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../dt-bindings/phy/phy-lantiq-vrx200-pcie.h  | 11 +++
> >  2 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/phy/phy-lantiq-vrx200-pcie.h
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..b7b222e772d0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> The preference is (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) for new bindings.
to make sure I understand this correctly:
the license is then only valid for the bindings - is it fine if the
driver uses GPL-2.0-only?

I don't have any datasheet for these SoCs so all my knowledge is based
on the GPL-2.0-only driver from the Lantiq board support package
(called "UGW").
the .yaml file is 100% my own work so I'm fine with having GPL-2.0 OR
BSD-2-Clause
however, that still has to be compatible with my driver, which I chose
to be GPL-2.0-only because that's the license from the Lantiq board
support package


Martin