[PATCH][next] drm/amdgpu/psp: fix incorrect logic when checking asic_type

[Colin King]

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Currently the check of the asic_type is always returning true because
of the use of ||.  Fix this by using && instead.  Also break overly
wide line.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Constant expression result")
Fixes: dab70ff24db6 ("drm/amdgpu/psp: add psp support for navi14")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v11_0.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v11_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v11_0.c
index 527dc371598d..e4afd34e3034 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v11_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v11_0.c
@@ -540,7 +540,8 @@ psp_v11_0_sram_map(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
 
 	case AMDGPU_UCODE_ID_RLC_G:
 		*sram_offset = 0x2000;
-		if (adev->asic_type != CHIP_NAVI10 || adev->asic_type != CHIP_NAVI14) {
+		if (adev->asic_type != CHIP_NAVI10 &&
+		    adev->asic_type != CHIP_NAVI14) {
 			*sram_addr_reg_offset = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmRLC_GPM_UCODE_ADDR);
 			*sram_data_reg_offset = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmRLC_GPM_UCODE_DATA);
 		} else {
@@ -551,7 +552,8 @@ psp_v11_0_sram_map(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
 
 	case AMDGPU_UCODE_ID_SDMA0:
 		*sram_offset = 0x0;
-		if (adev->asic_type != CHIP_NAVI10 || adev->asic_type != CHIP_NAVI14) {
+		if (adev->asic_type != CHIP_NAVI10 &&
+		    adev->asic_type != CHIP_NAVI14) {
 			*sram_addr_reg_offset = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA0, 0, mmSDMA0_UCODE_ADDR);
 			*sram_data_reg_offset = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA0, 0, mmSDMA0_UCODE_DATA);
 		} else {
-- 
2.20.1