Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi_host: add support for request batching

[Hannes Reinecke]

On 7/4/19 3:19 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/06/19 12:31, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> I'm a bit unsure if 'bd->last' is always set; it's quite obvious that
>>> it's present if set, but what about requests with 'bd->last == false' ?
>>> Is there a guarantee that they will _always_ be followed with a request
>>> with bd->last == true?
>>> And if so, is there a guarantee that this request is part of the same batch?
>> It's complicated.  A request with bd->last == false _will_ always be
>> followed by a request with bd->last == true in the same batch.  However,
>> due to e.g. errors it may be possible that the last request is not sent.
>>  In that case, the block layer sends commit_rqs, as documented in the
>> comment above, to flush the requests that have been sent already.
>>
>> So, a driver that obeys bd->last (or SCMD_LAST) but does not implement
>> commit_rqs is bound to have bugs, which is why this patch was not split
>> further.
>>
>> Makes sense?
> 
> Hannes, can you provide your Reviewed-by?
> 
Well ... since you asked for it:

Where is the 'commit_rqs' callback actually used?
I seem to be going blind, but I can't find it; should be somewhere in
the first patch, no?
As per description:

 * The commit_rqs function is used to trigger a hardware
 * doorbell after some requests have been queued with
 * queuecommand, when an error is encountered before sending
 * the request with SCMD_LAST set.

So it should be somewhere in the error path, probably scsi_error or
something. But I don't seem to be able to find it ...

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 NÃrnberg
GF: Felix ImendÃrffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
HRB 21284 (AG NÃrnberg)