[PATCH] btrfs: reduce stack usage for btrfsic_process_written_block
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Mon Jul 08 2019 - 08:41:01 EST
btrfsic_process_written_block() cals btrfsic_process_metablock(),
which has a fairly large stack usage due to the btrfsic_stack_frame
variable. It also calls btrfsic_test_for_metadata(), which now
needs several hundreds of bytes for its SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK().
In some configurations, we end up with both functions on the
same stack, and gcc warns about the excessive stack usage that
might cause the available stack space to run out:
fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c:1743:13: error: stack frame size of 1152 bytes in function 'btrfsic_process_written_block' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
Marking both child functions as noinline_for_stack helps because
this guarantees that the large variables are not on the same
stack frame.
Fixes: d5178578bcd4 ("btrfs: directly call into crypto framework for checksumming")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
index 81a9731959a9..0b52ab4cb964 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
@@ -940,7 +940,7 @@ static void btrfsic_stack_frame_free(struct btrfsic_stack_frame *sf)
kfree(sf);
}
-static int btrfsic_process_metablock(
+static noinline_for_stack int btrfsic_process_metablock(
struct btrfsic_state *state,
struct btrfsic_block *const first_block,
struct btrfsic_block_data_ctx *const first_block_ctx,
@@ -1706,8 +1706,9 @@ static void btrfsic_dump_database(struct btrfsic_state *state)
* Test whether the disk block contains a tree block (leaf or node)
* (note that this test fails for the super block)
*/
-static int btrfsic_test_for_metadata(struct btrfsic_state *state,
- char **datav, unsigned int num_pages)
+static noinline_for_stack int btrfsic_test_for_metadata(
+ struct btrfsic_state *state,
+ char **datav, unsigned int num_pages)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = state->fs_info;
SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(shash, fs_info->csum_shash);
--
2.20.0