possible deadlock in rtnl_lock (6)

From: syzbot
Date: Mon Jul 08 2019 - 15:37:20 EST

Next message: Jason Gunthorpe: "Re: [PATCH v3] RDMA/core: Fix race when resolving IP address"
Previous message: syzbot: "WARNING: held lock freed! (2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following crash on:

HEAD commit: 537de0c8 ipv4: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ipv4_neigh_..
git tree: net
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14521cc3a00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=90f5d2d9c1e7421c
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=174ce29c2308dec5bc68
compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1777debba00000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=16969b53a00000

The bug was bisected to:

commit 455302d1c9ae9318660aaeb9748a01ff414c9741
Author: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Jun 28 08:04:07 2019 +0000

xdp: fix hang while unregistering device bound to xdp socket

bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=1179943da00000
final crash: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=1379943da00000
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1579943da00000

IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+174ce29c2308dec5bc68@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 455302d1c9ae ("xdp: fix hang while unregistering device bound to xdp socket")

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.2.0-rc6+ #76 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor613/9114 is trying to acquire lock:
000000002c564901 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20 net/core/rtnetlink.c:72

but task is already holding lock:
0000000039d6ee9b (&xs->mutex){+.+.}, at: xsk_bind+0x16a/0xe70 net/xdp/xsk.c:422

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&xs->mutex){+.+.}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:926 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xf7/0x1310 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1073
mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1088
xsk_notifier+0x149/0x290 net/xdp/xsk.c:730
notifier_call_chain+0xc2/0x230 kernel/notifier.c:95
__raw_notifier_call_chain kernel/notifier.c:396 [inline]
raw_notifier_call_chain+0x2e/0x40 kernel/notifier.c:403
call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x3f/0x90 net/core/dev.c:1749
call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:1761 [inline]
call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:1775 [inline]
rollback_registered_many+0x9b9/0xfc0 net/core/dev.c:8206
rollback_registered+0x109/0x1d0 net/core/dev.c:8248
unregister_netdevice_queue net/core/dev.c:9295 [inline]
unregister_netdevice_queue+0x1ee/0x2c0 net/core/dev.c:9288
br_dev_delete+0x145/0x1a0 net/bridge/br_if.c:383
br_del_bridge+0xd7/0x120 net/bridge/br_if.c:483
br_ioctl_deviceless_stub+0x2a4/0x7b0 net/bridge/br_ioctl.c:376
sock_ioctl+0x44b/0x780 net/socket.c:1141
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline]
file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:509 [inline]
do_vfs_ioctl+0xd5f/0x1380 fs/ioctl.c:696
ksys_ioctl+0xab/0xd0 fs/ioctl.c:713
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:720 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:718 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:718
do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x680 arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

-> #1 (&net->xdp.lock){+.+.}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:926 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xf7/0x1310 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1073
mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1088
xsk_notifier+0xa7/0x290 net/xdp/xsk.c:726
notifier_call_chain+0xc2/0x230 kernel/notifier.c:95
__raw_notifier_call_chain kernel/notifier.c:396 [inline]
raw_notifier_call_chain+0x2e/0x40 kernel/notifier.c:403
call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x3f/0x90 net/core/dev.c:1749
call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:1761 [inline]
call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:1775 [inline]
rollback_registered_many+0x9b9/0xfc0 net/core/dev.c:8206
rollback_registered+0x109/0x1d0 net/core/dev.c:8248
unregister_netdevice_queue net/core/dev.c:9295 [inline]
unregister_netdevice_queue+0x1ee/0x2c0 net/core/dev.c:9288
br_dev_delete+0x145/0x1a0 net/bridge/br_if.c:383
br_del_bridge+0xd7/0x120 net/bridge/br_if.c:483
br_ioctl_deviceless_stub+0x2a4/0x7b0 net/bridge/br_ioctl.c:376
sock_ioctl+0x44b/0x780 net/socket.c:1141
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline]
file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:509 [inline]
do_vfs_ioctl+0xd5f/0x1380 fs/ioctl.c:696
ksys_ioctl+0xab/0xd0 fs/ioctl.c:713
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:720 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:718 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:718
do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x680 arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

-> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4303
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:926 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xf7/0x1310 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1073
mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1088
rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20 net/core/rtnetlink.c:72
xdp_umem_assign_dev+0xbe/0x8b0 net/xdp/xdp_umem.c:96
xsk_bind+0x4d7/0xe70 net/xdp/xsk.c:488
__sys_bind+0x239/0x290 net/socket.c:1653
__do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1664 [inline]
__se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1662 [inline]
__x64_sys_bind+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:1662
do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x680 arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
rtnl_mutex --> &net->xdp.lock --> &xs->mutex

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&xs->mutex);
lock(&net->xdp.lock);
lock(&xs->mutex);
lock(rtnl_mutex);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor613/9114:
#0: 0000000039d6ee9b (&xs->mutex){+.+.}, at: xsk_bind+0x16a/0xe70 net/xdp/xsk.c:422

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 9114 Comm: syz-executor613 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc6+ #76
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_circular_bug.cold+0x1cc/0x28f kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1565
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2310 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2418 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2800 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x3755/0x5490 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3793
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4303
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:926 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xf7/0x1310 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1073
mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1088
rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20 net/core/rtnetlink.c:72
xdp_umem_assign_dev+0xbe/0x8b0 net/xdp/xdp_umem.c:96
xsk_bind+0x4d7/0xe70 net/xdp/xsk.c:488
__sys_bind+0x239/0x290 net/socket.c:1653
__do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1664 [inline]
__se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1662 [inline]
__x64_sys_bind+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:1662
do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x680 arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x447909
Code: e8 cc e7 ff ff 48 83 c4 18 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 3b 08 fc ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007fb2a478fd98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000031
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000006dcc58 RCX: 0000000000447909
RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00000000006dcc50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000006dcc5c
R13: 0000003066736362 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000003066736362

---
This bug is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

syzbot will keep track of this bug report. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
syzbot can test patches for this bug, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches

Next message: Jason Gunthorpe: "Re: [PATCH v3] RDMA/core: Fix race when resolving IP address"
Previous message: syzbot: "WARNING: held lock freed! (2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]