Re: linux-next: manual merge of the keys tree with the integrity tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:33:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the keys tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   security/integrity/digsig.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   8c655784e2cf ("integrity: Fix __integrity_init_keyring() section mismatch")
> 
> from the integrity tree and commit:
> 
>   79512db59dc8 ("keys: Replace uid/gid/perm permissions checking with an ACL")
> 
> from the keys tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc security/integrity/digsig.c
> index 868ade3e8970,e432900c00b9..000000000000
> --- a/security/integrity/digsig.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/digsig.c
> @@@ -69,9 -70,8 +70,9 @@@ int integrity_digsig_verify(const unsig
>   	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>   }
>   
>  -static int __integrity_init_keyring(const unsigned int id, struct key_acl *acl,
>  -				    struct key_restriction *restriction)
>  +static int __init __integrity_init_keyring(const unsigned int id,
> - 					   key_perm_t perm,
> ++					   struct key_acl *acl,
>  +					   struct key_restriction *restriction)
>   {
>   	const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
>   	int err = 0;

I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpEur3tb2WlS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature