Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] edac: Add support for Amazon's Annapurna Labs L1 EDAC
From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Tue Jul 09 2019 - 08:31:08 EST
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 14:01:03 +0300
"Hawa, Hanna" <hhhawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7/9/2019 12:32 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa<hhhawa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > A quick drive by review as I was feeling curious.
> > Just a couple of trivial queries and observation on the fact it
> > might be useful to add a few devm managed functions to cut down
> > on edac driver boilerplate.
> > Thanks,
> > Jonathan
> >> +#define ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_VALID GENMASK(31, 31)
> > For a single bit it's common to use BIT(31) rather than GENMASK to make
> > it explicit.
> Will fix.
> >> + edac_dev->mod_name = dev_name(dev);
> > I'd admit I'm not that familiar with edac, but seems odd that a
> > module name field would have the dev_name.
> Will fix when I got more inputs.
> >> + edac_device_free_ctl_info(edac_dev);
> > More a passing observation than a suggestion for this driver, but if there was
> > ever a place where it looked like a couple of devm_ allocation functions would
> > be useful, this is it;)
> > edac_dev = devm_device_alloc_ctrl_info(dev, ...)
> > ...
> > devm_edac_device_add_device(dev, ...)
> I agree.
> I can implement the devm_* functions in separate patches as this is not
> related to my patches (and not to delay this patches).