Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] memremap: Add support for read-only memory mappings

From: Will Deacon
Date: Wed Jul 10 2019 - 10:14:42 EST


On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 01:37:15PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Sometimes we have memories that are supposed to be read-only, but when
> we map these regions the best we can do is map them as write-back with
> MEMREMAP_WB. Introduce a read-only memory mapping (MEMREMAP_RO) that
> allows us to map reserved memory regions as read-only. This way, we're
> less likely to see these special memory regions become corrupted by
> stray writes to them.
>
> Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/io.h | 1 +
> kernel/iomem.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/io.h b/include/linux/io.h
> index 32e30e8fb9db..16c7f4498869 100644
> --- a/include/linux/io.h
> +++ b/include/linux/io.h
> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ enum {
> MEMREMAP_WC = 1 << 2,
> MEMREMAP_ENC = 1 << 3,
> MEMREMAP_DEC = 1 << 4,
> + MEMREMAP_RO = 1 << 5,
> };
>
> void *memremap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, unsigned long flags);
> diff --git a/kernel/iomem.c b/kernel/iomem.c
> index 93c264444510..10d5ef0ff09e 100644
> --- a/kernel/iomem.c
> +++ b/kernel/iomem.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,13 @@ static void *arch_memremap_wb(resource_size_t offset, unsigned long size)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef arch_memremap_ro
> +static void *arch_memremap_ro(resource_size_t offset, unsigned long size)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #ifndef arch_memremap_can_ram_remap
> static bool arch_memremap_can_ram_remap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size,
> unsigned long flags)
> @@ -84,7 +91,10 @@ void *memremap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, unsigned long flags)
> }
>
> /* Try all mapping types requested until one returns non-NULL */
> - if (flags & MEMREMAP_WB) {
> + if ((flags & MEMREMAP_RO) && is_ram != REGION_INTERSECTS)
> + addr = arch_memremap_ro(offset, size);
> +
> + if (!addr && (flags & MEMREMAP_WB)) {
> /*
> * MEMREMAP_WB is special in that it can be satisfied
> * from the direct map. Some archs depend on the
> @@ -103,7 +113,8 @@ void *memremap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, unsigned long flags)
> * address mapping. Enforce that this mapping is not aliasing
> * System RAM.
> */
> - if (!addr && is_ram == REGION_INTERSECTS && flags != MEMREMAP_WB) {
> + if (!addr && is_ram == REGION_INTERSECTS &&
> + (flags != MEMREMAP_WB || flags != MEMREMAP_RO)) {
> WARN_ONCE(1, "memremap attempted on ram %pa size: %#lx\n",
> &offset, (unsigned long) size);
> return NULL;

This function seems a little confused about whether 'flags' is really a
bitmap of flags, or whether it is equal to exactly one entry in the enum.
Given that I think it's sensible for somebody to specify 'MEMREMAP_RO |
MEMREMAP_WT', then we probably need to start checking these things a bit
more thoroughly so we can reject unsupported combinations at the very least.

Will