Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm/vmalloc.c: Modify struct vmap_area to reduce its size
From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Fri Jul 12 2019 - 09:50:06 EST
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 08:02:13PM +0800, Pengfei Li wrote:
> +++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
> @@ -51,15 +51,37 @@ struct vmap_area {
> unsigned long va_start;
> unsigned long va_end;
>
> - /*
> - * Largest available free size in subtree.
> - */
> - unsigned long subtree_max_size;
> - unsigned long flags;
> - struct rb_node rb_node; /* address sorted rbtree */
> - struct list_head list; /* address sorted list */
> - struct llist_node purge_list; /* "lazy purge" list */
> - struct vm_struct *vm;
> + union {
> + /* In rbtree and list sorted by address */
> + struct {
> + union {
> + /*
> + * In "busy" rbtree and list.
> + * rbtree root: vmap_area_root
> + * list head: vmap_area_list
> + */
> + struct vm_struct *vm;
> +
> + /*
> + * In "free" rbtree and list.
> + * rbtree root: free_vmap_area_root
> + * list head: free_vmap_area_list
> + */
> + unsigned long subtree_max_size;
> + };
> +
> + struct rb_node rb_node;
> + struct list_head list;
> + };
> +
> + /*
> + * In "lazy purge" list.
> + * llist head: vmap_purge_list
> + */
> + struct {
> + struct llist_node purge_list;
> + };
I don't think you need struct union struct union. Because llist_node
is just a pointer, you can get the same savings with just:
union {
struct llist_node purge_list;
struct vm_struct *vm;
unsigned long subtree_max_size;
};