On 7/12/19 1:09 AM, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
On 7/12/19 12:38 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
I don't see the per-cpu areas in here. But, the ASI macros in
entry_64.S (and asi_start_abort()) use per-cpu data.
We don't map all per-cpu areas, but only the per-cpu variables we need. ASI
code uses the per-cpu cpu_asi_session variable which is mapped when an ASI
is created (see patch 15/26):
No fair! I had per-cpu variables just for PTI at some point and had to
give them up! ;)
+ÂÂÂ /*
+ÂÂÂÂ * Map the percpu ASI sessions. This is used by interrupt handlers
+ÂÂÂÂ * to figure out if we have entered isolation and switch back to
+ÂÂÂÂ * the kernel address space.
+ÂÂÂÂ */
+ÂÂÂ err = ASI_MAP_CPUVAR(asi, cpu_asi_session);
+ÂÂÂ if (err)
+ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ return err;
Also, this stuff seems to do naughty stuff (calling C code, touching
per-cpu data) before the PTI CR3 writes have been done. But, I don't
see anything excluding PTI and this code from coexisting.
My understanding is that PTI CR3 writes only happens when switching to/from
userland. While ASI enter/exit/abort happens while we are already in the
kernel,
so asi_start_abort() is not called when coming from userland and so not
interacting with PTI.
OK, that makes sense. You only need to call C code when interrupted
from something in the kernel (deeper than the entry code), and those
were already running kernel C code anyway.
If this continues to live in the entry code, I think you have a good
clue where to start commenting.
BTW, the PTI CR3 writes are not *strictly* about the interrupt coming
from user vs. kernel. It's tricky because there's a window both in the
entry and exit code where you are in the kernel but have a userspace CR3
value. You end up needing a CR3 write when you have a userspace CR3
value when the interrupt occurred, not only when you interrupt userspace
itself.