Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: redefine PTRS_PER_PGD/PTRS_PER_PMD/PTRS_PER_PTE

[sh liu]

I think the previous description is unclear, and it is difficult for
readers to understand the meaning of these macros, because I never
understand. So I submitted this patch with reference to the definition
of arm. I think this way can make the reader easier to understand, and
I also think that this definition is more reasonable.

2019-06-29 2:52 GMT+08:00, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019, damon wrote:
>
>> Use the number of addresses to define the relevant macros.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: damon <liush.damon@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch looks reasonable to me.  But what's missing from the
> description is the motivation.  Is this a prerequisite for another patch
> that you're planning to post?  Or because you think this is clearer than
> the original?  Or something else?  etc.
>
>
> - Paul
>