Re: [PATCH v4, 05/33] dt-bindings: mediatek: add RDMA1 description for mt8183 display

[CK Hu]

Hi, Rob:

On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 14:16 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 06:33:45AM +0800, yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This patch add RDMA1 description for mt8183 display
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt
> > index afd3c90..bb9274a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ Required properties (all function blocks):
> >  	"mediatek,<chip>-disp-ovl"   		- overlay (4 layers, blending, csc)
> >  	"mediatek,<chip>-disp-ovl-2l"           - overlay (2 layers, blending, csc)
> >  	"mediatek,<chip>-disp-rdma"  		- read DMA / line buffer
> > +	"mediatek,<chip>-disp-rdma1"            - function is same with RDMA, fifo size is different
> 
> This can't be determined by which chip it is? IOW, a chip may have both 
> rdma and rdma1?

In MT8183, there are two different rdma. The difference is the fifo size
in each one. I've a question: is it better to have two compatible string
for each one, or just one compatible string for both but with a property
to set fifo size?

Regards,
CK

> 
> >  	"mediatek,<chip>-disp-wdma"  		- write DMA
> >  	"mediatek,<chip>-disp-ccorr"            - color correction
> >  	"mediatek,<chip>-disp-color" 		- color processor
> > -- 
> > 1.8.1.1.dirty
> >