Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/memory-failure: Poison read receives SIGKILL instead of SIGBUS if mmaped more than once
From: Jane Chu
Date: Thu Jul 25 2019 - 14:03:02 EST
On 7/24/2019 4:43 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:33:23PM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
Mmap /dev/dax more than once, then read the poison location using address
from one of the mappings. The other mappings due to not having the page
mapped in will cause SIGKILLs delivered to the process. SIGKILL succeeds
over SIGBUS, so user process looses the opportunity to handle the UE.
Although one may add MAP_POPULATE to mmap(2) to work around the issue,
MAP_POPULATE makes mapping 128GB of pmem several magnitudes slower, so
isn't always an option.
Details -
ndctl inject-error --block=10 --count=1 namespace6.0
./read_poison -x dax6.0 -o 5120 -m 2
mmaped address 0x7f5bb6600000
mmaped address 0x7f3cf3600000
doing local read at address 0x7f3cf3601400
Killed
Console messages in instrumented kernel -
mce: Uncorrected hardware memory error in user-access at edbe201400
Memory failure: tk->addr = 7f5bb6601000
Memory failure: address edbe201: call dev_pagemap_mapping_shift
dev_pagemap_mapping_shift: page edbe201: no PUD
Memory failure: tk->size_shift == 0
Memory failure: Unable to find user space address edbe201 in read_poison
Memory failure: tk->addr = 7f3cf3601000
Memory failure: address edbe201: call dev_pagemap_mapping_shift
Memory failure: tk->size_shift = 21
Memory failure: 0xedbe201: forcibly killing read_poison:22434 because of failure to unmap corrupted page
=> to deliver SIGKILL
Memory failure: 0xedbe201: Killing read_poison:22434 due to hardware memory corruption
=> to deliver SIGBUS
Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index d9cc660..bd4db33 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ struct to_kill {
struct task_struct *tsk;
unsigned long addr;
short size_shift;
- char addr_valid;
};
/*
@@ -304,43 +303,43 @@ static unsigned long dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(struct page *page,
/*
* Schedule a process for later kill.
* Uses GFP_ATOMIC allocations to avoid potential recursions in the VM.
- * TBD would GFP_NOIO be enough?
*/
static void add_to_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p,
struct vm_area_struct *vma,
- struct list_head *to_kill,
- struct to_kill **tkc)
+ struct list_head *to_kill)
{
struct to_kill *tk;
- if (*tkc) {
- tk = *tkc;
- *tkc = NULL;
- } else {
- tk = kmalloc(sizeof(struct to_kill), GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!tk) {
- pr_err("Memory failure: Out of memory while machine check handling\n");
- return;
- }
+ tk = kmalloc(sizeof(struct to_kill), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!tk) {
+ pr_err("Memory failure: Out of memory while machine check handling\n");
+ return;
As Dan pointed out, the cleanup part can be delivered as a separate patch.
My bad, will take care splitting up the patch.
}
+
tk->addr = page_address_in_vma(p, vma);
- tk->addr_valid = 1;
if (is_zone_device_page(p))
tk->size_shift = dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(p, vma);
else
tk->size_shift = compound_order(compound_head(p)) + PAGE_SHIFT;
/*
- * In theory we don't have to kill when the page was
- * munmaped. But it could be also a mremap. Since that's
- * likely very rare kill anyways just out of paranoia, but use
- * a SIGKILL because the error is not contained anymore.
+ * Send SIGKILL if "tk->addr == -EFAULT". Also, as
+ * "tk->size_shift" is always non-zero for !is_zone_device_page(),
+ * so "tk->size_shift == 0" effectively checks no mapping on
+ * ZONE_DEVICE. Indeed, when a devdax page is mmapped N times
+ * to a process' address space, it's possible not all N VMAs
+ * contain mappings for the page, but at least one VMA does.
+ * Only deliver SIGBUS with payload derived from the VMA that
+ * has a mapping for the page.
OK, so SIGBUSs are sent M times (where M is the number of mappings
for the page). Then I'm convinced that we need "else if" block below.
Yes. I run read_poison that mmaps /dev/dax 4 times with MAPS_POPULATE flag
set, so the kernel attempted sending SIGBUS 4 times.
One time, while the poison was consumed at uaddr[1] (2nd mmap), but the
SIGBUS payload indicated the si_addr was uaddr[3] (4th mmap).
thanks!
-jane
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
*/
- if (tk->addr == -EFAULT || tk->size_shift == 0) {
+ if (tk->addr == -EFAULT) {
pr_info("Memory failure: Unable to find user space address %lx in %s\n",
page_to_pfn(p), tsk->comm);
- tk->addr_valid = 0;
+ } else if (tk->size_shift == 0) {
+ kfree(tk);
+ return;
}
+
get_task_struct(tsk);
tk->tsk = tsk;
list_add_tail(&tk->nd, to_kill);
@@ -366,7 +365,7 @@ static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill, bool fail,
* make sure the process doesn't catch the
* signal and then access the memory. Just kill it.
*/
- if (fail || tk->addr_valid == 0) {
+ if (fail || tk->addr == -EFAULT) {
pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: forcibly killing %s:%d because of failure to unmap corrupted page\n",
pfn, tk->tsk->comm, tk->tsk->pid);
do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_PRIV,
@@ -432,7 +431,7 @@ static struct task_struct *task_early_kill(struct task_struct *tsk,
* Collect processes when the error hit an anonymous page.
*/
static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
- struct to_kill **tkc, int force_early)
+ int force_early)
{
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -457,7 +456,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
if (!page_mapped_in_vma(page, vma))
continue;
if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm)
- add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill, tkc);
+ add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill);
}
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
@@ -468,7 +467,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
* Collect processes when the error hit a file mapped page.
*/
static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
- struct to_kill **tkc, int force_early)
+ int force_early)
{
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -492,7 +491,7 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
* to be informed of all such data corruptions.
*/
if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm)
- add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill, tkc);
+ add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill);
}
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
@@ -501,26 +500,17 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
/*
* Collect the processes who have the corrupted page mapped to kill.
- * This is done in two steps for locking reasons.
- * First preallocate one tokill structure outside the spin locks,
- * so that we can kill at least one process reasonably reliable.
*/
static void collect_procs(struct page *page, struct list_head *tokill,
int force_early)
{
- struct to_kill *tk;
-
if (!page->mapping)
return;
- tk = kmalloc(sizeof(struct to_kill), GFP_NOIO);
- if (!tk)
- return;
if (PageAnon(page))
- collect_procs_anon(page, tokill, &tk, force_early);
+ collect_procs_anon(page, tokill, force_early);
else
- collect_procs_file(page, tokill, &tk, force_early);
- kfree(tk);
+ collect_procs_file(page, tokill, force_early);
}
static const char *action_name[] = {
--
1.8.3.1