Re: [RFC PATCH 03/11] devfreq: exynos-bus: Change goto-based logic to if-else logic

[Chanwoo Choi]

2019ë 7ì 24ì (ì) ìì 8:08, Artur ÅwigoÅ <a.swigon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>ëì ìì:
>
> This patch improves code readability by changing the following construct:
>
> >    if (cond)
> >        goto passive;
> >    foo();
> >    goto out;
> >passive:
> >    bar();
> >out:
>
> into this:
>
> >    if (cond)
> >        bar();
> >    else
> >        foo();
>
> Signed-off-by: Artur ÅwigoÅ <a.swigon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> index cf6f6cbd0f55..4bb83b945bf7 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> @@ -505,25 +505,19 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "devfreq", 0);
>         if (node) {
>                 of_node_put(node);
> -               goto passive;
> +               ret = exynos_bus_profile_init_passive(bus, profile);
> +               if (ret < 0)
> +                       goto err;
>         } else {
>                 ret = exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(np, bus);
> +               if (ret < 0)
> +                       goto err;
> +
> +               ret = exynos_bus_profile_init(bus, profile);
> +               if (ret < 0)
> +                       goto err;
>         }
>
> -       if (ret < 0)
> -               goto err;
> -
> -       ret = exynos_bus_profile_init(bus, profile);
> -       if (ret < 0)
> -               goto err;
> -
> -       goto out;
> -passive:
> -       ret = exynos_bus_profile_init_passive(bus, profile);
> -       if (ret < 0)
> -               goto err;
> -
> -out:
>         max_state = bus->devfreq->profile->max_state;
>         min_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[0] / 1000);
>         max_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[max_state - 1] / 1000);
> --
> 2.17.1
>

It seems more simple than before.
Instead, please merge patch1/2/3 to one patch. and drop the patch4.

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi