On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 10:34 +0800, tanhuazhong wrote:
On 2019/7/25 2:34, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 11:18 +0800, Huazhong Tan wrote:
From: Yufeng Mo <moyufeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
This patch modifies firmware version display format in
hclge(vf)_cmd_init() and hns3_get_drvinfo(). Also, adds
some optimizations for firmware version display format.
Signed-off-by: Yufeng Mo <moyufeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Huazhong Tan <tanhuazhong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hnae3.h | 9
+++++++++
drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_ethtool.c | 15
+++++++++++++--
drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_cmd.c | 10
+++++++++-
drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_cmd.c | 11
+++++++++--
4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
[...]
Since on each board we only have one firmware, the firmware--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_cmd.c
@@ -419,7 +419,15 @@ int hclge_cmd_init(struct hclge_dev *hdev)
}
hdev->fw_version = version;
- dev_info(&hdev->pdev->dev, "The firmware version is %08x\n",
version);
+ pr_info_once("The firmware version is %lu.%lu.%lu.%lu\n",
+ hnae3_get_field(version,
HNAE3_FW_VERSION_BYTE3_MASK,
+ HNAE3_FW_VERSION_BYTE3_SHIFT),
+ hnae3_get_field(version,
HNAE3_FW_VERSION_BYTE2_MASK,
+ HNAE3_FW_VERSION_BYTE2_SHIFT),
+ hnae3_get_field(version,
HNAE3_FW_VERSION_BYTE1_MASK,
+ HNAE3_FW_VERSION_BYTE1_SHIFT),
+ hnae3_get_field(version,
HNAE3_FW_VERSION_BYTE0_MASK,
+ HNAE3_FW_VERSION_BYTE0_SHIFT));
Device name/string will not be printed now, what happens if i have
multiple devices ? at least print the device name as it was before
version is same per device, and will not change when running.
So pr_info_once() looks good for this case.
boards change too often to have such static assumption.
BTW, maybe we should change below print in the end of
hclge_init_ae_dev(), use dev_info() instead of pr_info(),
then we can know that which device has already initialized.
I will send other patch to do that, is it acceptable for you?
"pr_info("%s driver initialization finished.\n", HCLGE_DRIVER_NAME);"
I would avoid using pr_info when i can ! if you have the option to
print with dev information as it was before that is preferable.
Thanks,
Saeed.