Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] EDAC/amd64: Recognize DRAM device type with EDAC_CTL_CAP

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Fri Aug 02 2019 - 03:42:33 EST


On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 09:56:55PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx>
>
> AMD Family 17h systems support x4 and x16 DRAM devices. However, the
> device type is not checked when setting EDAC_CTL_CAP.
>
> Set the appropriate EDAC_CTL_CAP flag based on the device type.
>
> Fixes: 2d09d8f301f5 ("EDAC, amd64: Determine EDAC MC capabilities on Fam17h")

This is better: a patch which fixes a previous patch and is simple,
small and clear. That you can tag with Fixes: just fine.

> Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Link:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531234501.32826-4-Yazen.Ghannam@xxxxxxx
>
> v1->v2:
> * No change.
>
> drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> index dd60cf5a3d96..125d6e2a828e 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> @@ -3150,12 +3150,15 @@ static bool ecc_enabled(struct pci_dev *F3, u16 nid)
> static inline void
> f17h_determine_edac_ctl_cap(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, struct amd64_pvt *pvt)
> {
> - u8 i, ecc_en = 1, cpk_en = 1;
> + u8 i, ecc_en = 1, cpk_en = 1, dev_x4 = 1, dev_x16 = 1;
>
> for_each_umc(i) {
> if (pvt->umc[i].sdp_ctrl & UMC_SDP_INIT) {
> ecc_en &= !!(pvt->umc[i].umc_cap_hi & UMC_ECC_ENABLED);
> cpk_en &= !!(pvt->umc[i].umc_cap_hi & UMC_ECC_CHIPKILL_CAP);
> +
> + dev_x4 &= !!(pvt->umc[i].dimm_cfg & BIT(6));
> + dev_x16 &= !!(pvt->umc[i].dimm_cfg & BIT(7));

Are those bits mutually exclusive?

I.e., so that you can do:

if (dev_x4)
mci->edac_ctl_cap |= EDAC_FLAG_S4ECD4ED;
else
mci->edac_ctl_cap |= EDAC_FLAG_S16ECD16ED;

?

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.