Re: [PATCH 6/6] mtd: spi-nor: Add the SPI_NOR_XSR_RDY flag

From: Vignesh Raghavendra
Date: Mon Aug 05 2019 - 01:13:57 EST




On 31/07/19 2:42 PM, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> S3AN flashes use a specific opcode to read the status register.
> We currently use the SPI_S3AN flag to decide whether this specific
> SR read opcode should be used, but SPI_S3AN is about to disappear, so
> let's add a new flag.
>

I think you can drop SPI_S3AN right away either as separate patch in
this series or as part of this patch itself.

Regards
Vignesh

> Note that we use the same bit as SPI_S3AN implies SPI_NOR_XSR_RDY and
> vice versa.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> index 5fea5d7ce2cb..01be6d49ce3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> @@ -213,6 +213,14 @@ struct flash_info {
> * bit. Must be used with
> * SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK.
> */
> +#define SPI_NOR_XSR_RDY BIT(10) /*
> + * S3AN flashes have specific opcode to
> + * read the status register.
> + * Flags SPI_NOR_XSR_RDY and SPI_S3AN
> + * use the same bit as one implies the
> + * other, but we will get rid of
> + * SPI_S3AN soon.
> + */
> #define SPI_S3AN BIT(10) /*
> * Xilinx Spartan 3AN In-System Flash
> * (MFR cannot be used for probing
> @@ -4818,7 +4826,7 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name,
> * spi_nor_wait_till_ready(). Xilinx S3AN share MFR
> * with Atmel spi-nor
> */
> - if (info->flags & SPI_S3AN)
> + if (info->flags & SPI_NOR_XSR_RDY)
> nor->flags |= SNOR_F_READY_XSR_RDY;
>
> /* Kept only for backward compatibility purpose. */
>

--
Regards
Vignesh