Re: [RFC PATCH 23/40] soundwire: stream: fix disable sequence

[Sanyog Kale]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:40:15PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> When we disable the stream and then call hw_free, two bank switches
> will be handled and as a result we re-enable the stream on hw_free.
>

I didnt quite get why there will be two bank switches as part of disable flow
which leads to enabling of stream?

> Make sure the stream is disabled on both banks.
> 
> TODO: we need to completely revisit all this and make sure we have a
> mirroring mechanism between current and alternate banks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/soundwire/stream.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
> index 53f5e790fcd7..75b9ad1fb1a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
> @@ -1637,7 +1637,24 @@ static int _sdw_disable_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	return do_bank_switch(stream);
> +	ret = do_bank_switch(stream);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(bus->dev, "Bank switch failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* make sure alternate bank (previous current) is also disabled */
> +	list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) {
> +		bus = m_rt->bus;
> +		/* Disable port(s) */
> +		ret = sdw_enable_disable_ports(m_rt, false);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err(bus->dev, "Disable port(s) failed: %d\n", ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

--