Re: possible deadlock in open_rio
From: Alan Stern
Date: Wed Aug 07 2019 - 10:01:58 EST
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 9:13 PM Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, syzbot wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > syzbot found the following crash on:
> > >
> > > HEAD commit: 7f7867ff usb-fuzzer: main usb gadget fuzzer driver
> > > git tree: https://github.com/google/kasan.git usb-fuzzer
> > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=136b6aec600000
> > > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=792eb47789f57810
> > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7bbcbe9c9ff0cd49592a
> > > compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
> > >
> > > IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> > > Reported-by: syzbot+7bbcbe9c9ff0cd49592a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > ======================================================
> > > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> > > 5.3.0-rc2+ #23 Not tainted
> > > ------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Andrey:
> >
> > This should be completely reproducible, since it's a simple ABBA
> > locking violation. Maybe just introducing a time delay (to avoid races
> > and give the open() call time to run) between the gadget creation and
> > gadget removal would be enough to do it.
>
> I've tried some simple approaches to reproducing this, but failed.
> Should this require two rio500 devices to trigger?
No, one device should be enough. Just plug it in and then try to open
the character device file.
Alan Stern
> > Is there any way you can test this?
>
> Not yet.
>
> >
> > Alan Stern