Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2 -mm] mm: account lazy free pages separately

From: Yang Shi
Date: Fri Aug 09 2019 - 12:19:37 EST




On 8/9/19 1:32 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-08-19 07:57:44, Yang Shi wrote:
When doing partial unmap to THP, the pages in the affected range would
be considered to be reclaimable when memory pressure comes in. And,
such pages would be put on deferred split queue and get minus from the
memory statistics (i.e. /proc/meminfo).

For example, when doing THP split test, /proc/meminfo would show:

Before put on lazy free list:
MemTotal: 45288336 kB
MemFree: 43281376 kB
MemAvailable: 43254048 kB
...
Active(anon): 1096296 kB
Inactive(anon): 8372 kB
...
AnonPages: 1096264 kB
...
AnonHugePages: 1056768 kB

After put on lazy free list:
MemTotal: 45288336 kB
MemFree: 43282612 kB
MemAvailable: 43255284 kB
...
Active(anon): 1094228 kB
Inactive(anon): 8372 kB
...
AnonPages: 49668 kB
...
AnonHugePages: 10240 kB

The THPs confusingly look disappeared although they are still on LRU if
you are not familair the tricks done by kernel.
Is this a fallout of the recent deferred freeing work?

This series follows up the discussion happened when reviewing "Make deferred split shrinker memcg aware".

David Rientjes suggested deferred split THP should be accounted into available memory since they would be shrunk when memory pressure comes in, just like MADV_FREE pages. For the discussion, please refer to: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg2010115.html


Accounted the lazy free pages to NR_LAZYFREE, and show them in meminfo
and other places. With the change the /proc/meminfo would look like:
Before put on lazy free list:
The name is really confusing because I have thought of MADV_FREE immediately.

Yes, I agree. We may use a more specific name, i.e. DeferredSplitTHP.


+LazyFreePages: Cleanly freeable pages under memory pressure (i.e. deferred
+ split THP).
What does that mean actually? I have hard time imagine what cleanly
freeable pages mean.

Like deferred split THP and MADV_FREE pages, they could be reclaimed during memory pressure.

If you just go with "DeferredSplitTHP", these ambiguity would go away.