[PATCH 3/7] dma: iop-adma: use correct printk format strings

[Arnd Bergmann]

When compile-testing on other architectures, we get lots of warnings
about incorrect format strings, like:

   drivers/dma/iop-adma.c: In function 'iop_adma_alloc_slots':
   drivers/dma/iop-adma.c:307:6: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]

   drivers/dma/iop-adma.c: In function 'iop_adma_prep_dma_memcpy':
>> drivers/dma/iop-adma.c:518:40: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'size_t {aka long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]

Use %zu for printing size_t as required, and cast the dma_addr_t
arguments to 'u64' for printing with %llx. Ideally this should use
the %pad format string, but that requires an lvalue argument that
doesn't work here.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/dma/iop-adma.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c b/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c
index 7857b54770d1..aebdd671651a 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c
@@ -117,9 +117,9 @@ static void __iop_adma_slot_cleanup(struct iop_adma_chan *iop_chan)
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, _iter, &iop_chan->chain,
 					chain_node) {
 		pr_debug("\tcookie: %d slot: %d busy: %d "
-			"this_desc: %#x next_desc: %#x ack: %d\n",
+			"this_desc: %#x next_desc: %#llx ack: %d\n",
 			iter->async_tx.cookie, iter->idx, busy,
-			iter->async_tx.phys, iop_desc_get_next_desc(iter),
+			iter->async_tx.phys, (u64)iop_desc_get_next_desc(iter),
 			async_tx_test_ack(&iter->async_tx));
 		prefetch(_iter);
 		prefetch(&_iter->async_tx);
@@ -307,9 +307,9 @@ iop_adma_alloc_slots(struct iop_adma_chan *iop_chan, int num_slots,
 				int i;
 				dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev,
 					"allocated slot: %d "
-					"(desc %p phys: %#x) slots_per_op %d\n",
+					"(desc %p phys: %#llx) slots_per_op %d\n",
 					iter->idx, iter->hw_desc,
-					iter->async_tx.phys, slots_per_op);
+					(u64)iter->async_tx.phys, slots_per_op);
 
 				/* pre-ack all but the last descriptor */
 				if (num_slots != slots_per_op)
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dma_dest,
 		return NULL;
 	BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
 
-	dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s len: %u\n",
+	dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s len: %zu\n",
 		__func__, len);
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&iop_chan->lock);
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_xor(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dma_dest,
 	BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
 
 	dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev,
-		"%s src_cnt: %d len: %u flags: %lx\n",
+		"%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu flags: %lx\n",
 		__func__, src_cnt, len, flags);
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&iop_chan->lock);
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_xor_val(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t *dma_src,
 	if (unlikely(!len))
 		return NULL;
 
-	dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u\n",
+	dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu\n",
 		__func__, src_cnt, len);
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&iop_chan->lock);
@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_pq(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t *dst, dma_addr_t *src,
 	BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
 
 	dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev,
-		"%s src_cnt: %d len: %u flags: %lx\n",
+		"%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu flags: %lx\n",
 		__func__, src_cnt, len, flags);
 
 	if (dmaf_p_disabled_continue(flags))
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_pq_val(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t *pq, dma_addr_t *src,
 		return NULL;
 	BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
 
-	dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u\n",
+	dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu\n",
 		__func__, src_cnt, len);
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&iop_chan->lock);
-- 
2.20.0