Re: [PATCH 0/3] watchdog: jz4740: Driver update

[Guenter Roeck]

On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:34:49PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> 
> 
> Le ven. 9 août 2019 à 19:29, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> >On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:55:26PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> >> Hi Guenter,
> >>
> >>
> >> Le ven. 9 août 2019 à 18:52, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit
> >>:
> >> >On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> This patchset comes from a bigger patchset that was cut in smaller
> >> >> pieces for easier integration to mainline.
> >> >> (The patchset was https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/27/1837)
> >> >>
> >> >> The reviews were kept since the code mostly didn't change. The
> >> >>exception
> >> >> is the use of device_node_to_regmap() in patch 2/3. This function
> >>was
> >> >> added in a prior patch, now merged in the MIPS tree.
> >> >>
> >> >> For that reason this patchset is based on the ingenic-tcu-v5.4
> >>branch
> >> >>of
> >> >> the MIPS tree
> >> >> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux.git).
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >What is the expectation here ? Should the series be sent upstream
> >> >through the watchdog tree, or through some other tree ?
> >>
> >> You can get it through the watchdog tree if you merge the
> >>ingenic-tcu-v5.4
> >> branch from the MIPS tree. If you'd rather not do that, I can get it
> >>merged
> >> through the MIPS tree.
> >>
> >I would prefer a merge through the mips tree.
> >
> >Guenter
> 
> Ok; Can I get some signatures then? ;)
> 

They are already tagged with my Reviewed-by:. Do you want an Acked-by:
as well ? Sure, no problem.

Guenter