Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] PCI: dw: Add support for PCI_PROBE_ONLY/PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_BUS flags

[Chocron, Jonathan]

On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 11:58 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Side note, run:
> 
> git log --oneline on drivers/pci/controller/dwc existing files and
> make sure commit subjects are in line with those.
> 
> Eg PCI: dw: should be PCI: dwc:
> 
Done.

> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 09:30:05AM +0000, Chocron, Jonathan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 17:36 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 12:27:11PM +0300, Jonathan Chocron wrote:
> > > > This basically aligns the usage of PCI_PROBE_ONLY and
> > > > PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_BUS in dw_pcie_host_init() with the logic in
> > > > pci_host_common_probe().
> > > > 
> > > > Now it will be possible to control via the devicetree whether
> > > > to
> > > > just
> > > > probe the PCI bus (in cases where FW already configured it) or
> > > > to
> > > > fully
> > > > configure it.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Chocron <jonnyc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 23
> > > > +++++++++++++++----
> > > >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > > > index d2ca748e4c85..0a294d8aa21a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > > > @@ -342,6 +342,8 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> > > >  	if (!bridge)
> > > >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > > >  
> > > > +	of_pci_check_probe_only();
> > > > +
> > > >  	ret = devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(dev, 0,
> > > > 0xff,
> > > >  					&bridge->windows, &pp-
> > > > > io_base);
> > > > 
> > > >  	if (ret)
> > > > @@ -474,6 +476,10 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port
> > > > *pp)
> > > >  
> > > >  	pp->root_bus_nr = pp->busn->start;
> > > >  
> > > > +	/* Do not reassign bus nums if probe only */
> > > > +	if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY))
> > > > +		pci_add_flags(PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_BUS);
> > > 
> > > This changes the default for bus reassignment on all DWC host
> > > (that
> > > are
> > > !PCI_PROBE_ONLY), we should drop this line, it can trigger
> > > regressions.
> > > 
> > 
> > Will be dropped as part of v4. There might also be a behavioral
> > difference below where I added the if
> > (pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)).
> > Is that still ok?
> 
> That's true but I doubt any DWC host has a DT firmware with
> "linux,pci-probe-only" in it.
> 
> It is trial and error I am afraid, please make sure all DWC
> maintainers are copied in.
> 
> > As I pointed out in the cover letter, since PCI_PROBE_ONLY is a
> > system
> > wide flag, does it make sense to call of_pci_check_probe_only()
> > here,
> > in the context of a specific driver (including the existing
> > invocation
> > in pci_host_common_probe()), as opposed to a platform/arch context?
> 
> It is an ongoing discussion to define how we should handle
> PCI_PROBE_ONLY. Adding this code into DWC I do not think it
> would hurt but if we can postpone it for the next (v5.5) merge
> window after we debate this at LPC within the PCI microconference
> it would be great.
> 
The preceding patches are more urgent, so I'm fine with postponing this
patch to the next merge window (I'll drop it from v4).

> Please sync with Benjamin as a first step, I trust he would ask
> you to do the right thing.
> 
Of course, I'll sync with him. But again, let's not have this patch
delay the others please.

> > > If we still want to merge it as a separate change we must test it
> > > on
> > > all
> > > DWC host bridges to make sure it does not trigger any issues with
> > > current set-ups, that's not going to be easy though.
> > > 
> > 
> > Just out of curiosity, how are such exhaustive tests achieved when
> > a
> > patch requires them?
> 
> CC DWC host bridge maintainers and ask them to test it. I do not have
> the HW (and FW) required, I am sorry, that's the only option I can
> give
> you. -next coverage would help too but to a minor extent.
> 
Thanks for the info!

> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
> 
> > 
> > > Lorenzo
> > > 
> > > > +
> > > >  	bridge->dev.parent = dev;
> > > >  	bridge->sysdata = pp;
> > > >  	bridge->busnr = pp->root_bus_nr;
> > > > @@ -490,11 +496,20 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port
> > > > *pp)
> > > >  	if (pp->ops->scan_bus)
> > > >  		pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
> > > >  
> > > > -	pci_bus_size_bridges(pp->root_bus);
> > > > -	pci_bus_assign_resources(pp->root_bus);
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * We insert PCI resources into the iomem_resource and
> > > > +	 * ioport_resource trees in either
> > > > pci_bus_claim_resources()
> > > > +	 * or pci_bus_assign_resources().
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	if (pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
> > > > +		pci_bus_claim_resources(pp->root_bus);
> > > > +	} else {
> > > > +		pci_bus_size_bridges(pp->root_bus);
> > > > +		pci_bus_assign_resources(pp->root_bus);
> > > >  
> > > > -	list_for_each_entry(child, &pp->root_bus->children,
> > > > node)
> > > > -		pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
> > > > +		list_for_each_entry(child, &pp->root_bus-
> > > > >children,
> > > > node)
> > > > +			pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
> > > > +	}
> > > >  
> > > >  	pci_bus_add_devices(pp->root_bus);
> > > >  	return 0;
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.17.1
> > > >