Hi Shuah,
On 8/12/19 11:08 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 8/9/19 9:51 PM, Helen Koike wrote:
Hi Andre,
Thanks for testing this.
On 8/9/19 9:24 PM, Andrà Almeida wrote:
On 8/9/19 9:17 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
Hi Andre,
On 8/9/19 5:52 PM, Andrà Almeida wrote:
Hello Shuah,
Thanks for the patch, I did some comments below.
On 8/9/19 6:45 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
vimc uses Component API to split the driver into functional
components.
The real hardware resembles a monolith structure than component and
component structure added a level of complexity making it hard to
maintain without adding any real benefit.
ÂÂÂÂÂ The sensor is one vimc component that would makes sense to be a
separate
module to closely align with the real hardware. It would be easier to
collapse vimc into single monolithic driver first and then split the
sensor off as a separate module.
This patch series emoves the component API and makes minimal
changes to
the code base preserving the functional division of the code
structure.
Preserving the functional structure allows us to split the sensor off
as a separate module in the future.
Major design elements in this change are:
ÂÂÂÂÂ - Use existing struct vimc_ent_config and struct
vimc_pipeline_config
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ to drive the initialization of the functional components.
ÂÂÂÂÂ - Make vimc_ent_config global by moving it to vimc.h
ÂÂÂÂÂ - Add two new hooks add and rm to initialize and register,
unregister
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ and free subdevs.
ÂÂÂÂÂ - All component API is now gone and bind and unbind hooks are
modified
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ to do "add" and "rm" with minimal changes to just add and rm
subdevs.
ÂÂÂÂÂ - vimc-core's bind and unbind are now register and unregister.
ÂÂÂÂÂ - vimc-core invokes "add" hooks from its
vimc_register_devices().
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ The "add" hooks remain the same and register subdevs. They
don't
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ create platform devices of their own and use vimc's
pdev.dev as
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ their reference device. The "add" hooks save their
vimc_ent_device(s)
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ in the corresponding vimc_ent_config.
ÂÂÂÂÂ - vimc-core invokes "rm" hooks from its unregister to
unregister
subdevs
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ and cleanup.
ÂÂÂÂÂ - vimc-core invokes "add" and "rm" hooks with pointer to struct
vimc_device
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ and the corresponding struct vimc_ent_config pointer.
ÂÂÂÂÂ The following configure and stream test works on all devices.
ÂÂÂÂÂ ÂÂÂÂ media-ctl -d platform:vimc -V '"Sensor
A":0[fmt:SBGGR8_1X8/640x480]'
ÂÂÂÂÂ media-ctl -d platform:vimc -V '"Debayer
A":0[fmt:SBGGR8_1X8/640x480]'
ÂÂÂÂÂ media-ctl -d platform:vimc -V '"Sensor
B":0[fmt:SBGGR8_1X8/640x480]'
ÂÂÂÂÂ media-ctl -d platform:vimc -V '"Debayer
B":0[fmt:SBGGR8_1X8/640x480]'
ÂÂÂÂÂ ÂÂÂÂ v4l2-ctl -z platform:vimc -d "RGB/YUV Capture" -v
width=1920,height=1440
ÂÂÂÂÂ v4l2-ctl -z platform:vimc -d "Raw Capture 0" -v
pixelformat=BA81
ÂÂÂÂÂ v4l2-ctl -z platform:vimc -d "Raw Capture 1" -v
pixelformat=BA81
ÂÂÂÂÂ ÂÂÂÂ v4l2-ctl --stream-mmap --stream-count=100 -d /dev/video1
ÂÂÂÂÂ v4l2-ctl --stream-mmap --stream-count=100 -d /dev/video2
ÂÂÂÂÂ v4l2-ctl --stream-mmap --stream-count=100 -d /dev/video3
The third patch in the series fixes a general protection fault found
when rmmod is done while stream is active.
I applied your patch on top of media_tree/master and I did some
testing.
Not sure if I did something wrong, but just adding and removing the
module generated a kernel panic:
Thanks for testing.
Odd. I tested modprobe and rmmod both.I was working on Linux 5.3-rc2.
I will apply these to media latest and work from there. I have to
rebase these on top of the reverts from Lucas and Helen
Ok, please let me know if I succeeded to reproduce.
~# modprobe vimc
~# rmmod vimc
[ÂÂ 16.452974] stack segment: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[ÂÂ 16.453688] CPU: 0 PID: 2038 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 5.3.0-rc2+ #36
[ÂÂ 16.454678] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
BIOS 1.12.0-20181126_142135-anatol 04/01/2014
[ÂÂ 16.456191] RIP: 0010:kfree+0x4d/0x240
<registers values...>
[ÂÂ 16.469188] Call Trace:
[ÂÂ 16.469666]Â vimc_remove+0x35/0x90 [vimc]
[ÂÂ 16.470436]Â platform_drv_remove+0x1f/0x40
[ÂÂ 16.471233]Â device_release_driver_internal+0xd3/0x1b0
[ÂÂ 16.472184]Â driver_detach+0x37/0x6b
[ÂÂ 16.472882]Â bus_remove_driver+0x50/0xc1
[ÂÂ 16.473569]Â vimc_exit+0xc/0xca0 [vimc]
[ÂÂ 16.474231]Â __x64_sys_delete_module+0x18d/0x240
[ÂÂ 16.475036]Â do_syscall_64+0x43/0x110
[ÂÂ 16.475656]Â entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ÂÂ 16.476504] RIP: 0033:0x7fceb8dafa4b
<registers values...>
[ÂÂ 16.484853] Modules linked in: vimc(-) videobuf2_vmalloc
videobuf2_memops v4l2_tpg videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common
[ÂÂ 16.486187] ---[ end trace 91e5e0894e254d49 ]---
[ÂÂ 16.486758] RIP: 0010:kfree+0x4d/0x240
<registers values...>
fish: ârmmod vimcâ terminated by signal SIGSEGV (Address boundary
error)
I just added the module after booting, no other action was made.
Here is
how my `git log --oneline` looks like:
897d708e922b media: vimc: Fix gpf in rmmod path when stream is active
2e4a5ad8ad6d media: vimc: Collapse component structure into a single
monolithic driver
7c8da1687e92 media: vimc: move private defines to a common header
97299a303532 media: Remove dev_err() usage after platform_get_irq()
25a3d6bac6b9 media: adv7511/cobalt: rename driver name to adv7511-v4l2
I couldn't reproduce the error, my tree looks the same:
[I] koike@floko ~/m/o/linux> git log --oneline
e3345155c8ed (HEAD) media: vimc: Fix gpf in rmmod path when stream is
active
43e9e2fe761f media: vimc: Collapse component structure into a single
monolithic driver
8a6d0b9adde0 media: vimc: move private defines to a common header
97299a303532 (media/master) media: Remove dev_err() usage after
platform_get_irq()
25a3d6bac6b9 media: adv7511/cobalt: rename driver name to adv7511-v4l2
Thanks Helen for trying to reproduce and sharing the result.
Me and Helen found out what is the problem. If you follow this call trace:
vimc_ent_sd_unregister()
v4l2_device_unregister_subdev()
v4l2_subdev_release()
You'll notice that this last function calls the `release` callback
implementation of the subdevice. For instance, the `release` of
vimc-sensor is this one:
static void vimc_sen_release(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
{
struct vimc_sen_device *vsen =
container_of(sd, struct vimc_sen_device, sd);
v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&vsen->hdl);
tpg_free(&vsen->tpg);
kfree(vsen);
}
And then you can see that `vsen` has been freed. Back to
vimc_ent_sd_unregister(), after v4l2_device_unregister_subdev(), the
function will call vimc_pads_cleanup(). This is basically a
kfree(ved->pads), but `ved` has just been freed at
v4l2_subdev_release(), producing a memory fault.
To fix that, we found two options:
- place the kfree(ved->pads) inside the release callback of each
subdevice and removing vimc_pads_cleanup() from
vimc_ent_sd_unregister()
- use a auxiliary variable to hold the address of the pads, for instance:
void vimc_ent_sd_unregister(...)
{
struct media_pad *pads = ved->pads;
...
vimc_pads_cleanup(pads);
}