Parsing PXM from ACPI (DSDT)

[Duran, Leo]

Hello,
Is not clear or evident to me if the kernel parses _PXM values below (or under) the root-complex.

For example, in my experience:
This ASL sample for PXM at the root-complex level produces the expected NUMA assignment from âlstopoâ:
Scope (\_SB) {
  // ...
  Device (PCI0) { // Root PCI Bus (Host-Bridge)
    Name (_HID, EISAID("PNP0A08"))
    Name (_CID, EISAID("PNP0A03"))
    Name (_BBN, 0)
    Method (_CRS,0) {
      // Return current resources for host bridge 0
    }
    Name (_PRT, Package() {
     // Package with PCI IRQ routing table information
    })
    Method (_PXM, 0, NotSerialized) {
      Return (0)
    }
  }
  // ...
}

However,
This ASL sample for PXM at the P2P root-bridge level does not produce the expected NUMA assignment from âlstopoâ:
 (Of course, the assumption is that multiple NUMA nodes actually exist on the system)

 Scope (\_SB) {
  // ...
  Device (PCI0) { // Root PCI Bus (Host-Bridge)
    Name (_HID, EISAID ("PNP0A08"))
    Name (_CID, EISAID ("PNP0A03"))
    Name (_BBN, 0)
    Method (_CRS,0) {
      // Return current resources for host bridge 0
    }
    Name (_PRT, Package() {
      // Package with PCI IRQ routing table information
    })

ÂÂÂ Device (P2P0) { // First PCI-to-PCI bridge (Port0)
ÂÂÂÂÂ Name (_ADR, 0x00070001) // Device#7h, Func#1 on bus PCI0
ÂÂÂÂÂ Name (_PRT, Package() {
ÂÂÂÂÂ   // Package with PCI IRQ routing table information
ÂÂÂÂÂ })
      Method (_PXM, 0, NotSerialized) {
        Return (0)
      }
ÂÂÂ }

ÂÂÂ Device (P2P1) { // Second PCI-to-PCI bridge (Port1)
ÂÂÂÂÂ Name (_ADR ,0x00080001) // Device#8h, Func#1 on bus PCI0
ÂÂÂÂÂ Name (_PRT, Package() {
ÂÂÂÂÂ   // Package with PCI IRQ routing table information
    }) 
      Method (_PXM, 0, NotSerialized) {
         Return (1)
      }
ÂÂÂ }
  }
  // ...
}

Thanks,
Leo.