Re: [RFC 1/5] media: dt-bindings: Document 'location' property

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Sakari,

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 09:56:35AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:28:11PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > Add the 'location' device property, used to specify the camera device
> > mounting position. The property is particularly meaningful for mobile
> > devices with a well defined usage orientation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
> > index f884ada0bffc..819077b2649c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
> > @@ -89,6 +89,10 @@ Optional properties
> >    but a number of degrees counter clockwise. Typical values are 0 and 180
> >    (upside down).
> > 
> > +- location: The camera device mounting position, relative to the device
> > +  usage orientation. Possible values are:
> > +  0 - Front camera. The image sensor is mounted on the front side of the device.
> > +  1 - Back camera. The image sensor is mounted on the back side of the device.
> 
> Would it make sense to make this a little more generic? Such as s/image
> sensor/ device/, for instance?
> 
> Is this also relevant for flash or lens devices?

I certainly hope that the flash or lens will be located on the same side
as the sensor... :-) It could however make sense to extend usage of this
property yet. I'm not sure I would do so already though, unless you
think all flash and lens controllers should really use it.

> Flash (torch) devices could be present, at least principle, without a
> camera. There once was even such a Nokia phone, 1100 unless I'm mistaken.
> :-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart