Re: [PATCH v3 -rcu] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check

From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Thu Aug 15 2019 - 10:57:53 EST


On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:18:42AM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> list_for_each_entry_rcu now has support to check for RCU reader sections
> as well as lock. Just use the support in it, instead of explicitly
> checking in the caller.

...

> #define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq) \
> RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
> !lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) && \

Can't you also get rid of this macro?

It's used in one place:

static struct pool_workqueue *unbound_pwq_by_node(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
int node)
{
assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq);

/*
* XXX: @node can be NUMA_NO_NODE if CPU goes offline while a
* delayed item is pending. The plan is to keep CPU -> NODE
* mapping valid and stable across CPU on/offlines. Once that
* happens, this workaround can be removed.
*/
if (unlikely(node == NUMA_NO_NODE))
return wq->dfl_pwq;

return rcu_dereference_raw(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node]);
}

Shouldn't we delete that assert and use

+ return rcu_dereference_check(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node],
+ lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) ||
+ lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex));