Re: [PATCH 2/2] of/platform: Disable generic device linking code for PowerPC

[Saravana Kannan]

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:41 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:04 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:27 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 1:27 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > PowerPC platforms don't use the generic of/platform code to populate the
> > > > devices from DT.
> > >
> > > Yes, they do.
> >
> > No they don't. My wording could be better, but they don't use
> > of_platform_default_populate_init()
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/of/platform.c#n511
>
> Right, but the rest of the of/platform code is used (guess where it
> got moved here from?).
>
> > > > Therefore the generic device linking code is never used
> > > > in PowerPC.  Compile it out to avoid warning about unused functions.
> > >
> > > I'd prefer this get disabled on PPC using 'if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC))
> > > return' rather than #ifdefs.
> >
> > I'm just moving the existing ifndef some lines above. I don't want to
> > go change existing #ifndef in this patch. Maybe that should be a
> > separate patch series that goes and fixes all such code in drivers/of/
> > or driver/
>
> So the initcall was originally just supposed to call
> of_platform_default_populate(), but it's grown beyond that. That could
> make things fragile as it is possible for platforms to call
> of_platform_populate() (directly or indirectly) before
> of_platform_default_populate_init(). That was supposed to work, but
> now I think it's getting more fragile.

Can you clarify what's wrong with of_platfrom_populate() being called
before of_platform_default_populate_init()? If that's what a platform
wants to do, they can do it? I have some thoughts of my own, but I
want to hear yours.
In any case, I'd be happy to help  clean up this initcall if you can
give me a direction to take it in.

> Anyways, I guess this patch is fine for now.

Thanks.

-Saravana