Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 6/8] mtd: spinand: micron: Turn driver implementation generic

[Miquel Raynal]

Hi Boris,

I need your opinion on the question below.

"Shivamurthy Shastri (sshivamurthy)" <sshivamurthy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on
Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:03:38 +0000:

> Hi Miquel,
> 
> > 
> > Hi Shiva,
> > 
> > shiva.linuxworks@xxxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 22 Jul 2019 07:56:19 +0200:
> >   
> > > From: Shivamurthy Shastri <sshivamurthy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >  
> > 
> > I am not sure the "turn implemenatation generic" title describes what
> > you do.
> >   
> > > Driver is redesigned using parameter page to support Micron SPI NAND
> > > flashes.  
> > 
> > Redesigned is perhaps a bit too much.
> > 
> > "  
> > > The reason why spinand_select_op_variant globalized is that the Micron
> > > driver no longer calling spinand_match_and_init.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shivamurthy Shastri <sshivamurthy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c   |  2 +-
> > >  drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------  
> > ---  
> > >  include/linux/mtd/spinand.h   |  4 +++
> > >  3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> > > index 7ae76dab9141..aae715d388b7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> > > @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static void spinand_manufacturer_cleanup(struct  
> > spinand_device *spinand)  
> > >  		return spinand->manufacturer->ops->cleanup(spinand);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static const struct spi_mem_op *
> > > +const struct spi_mem_op *
> > >  spinand_select_op_variant(struct spinand_device *spinand,
> > >  			  const struct spinand_op_variants *variants)
> > >  {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c  
> > b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c  
> > > index 95bc5264ebc1..6fde93ec23a1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c
> > > @@ -90,22 +90,10 @@ static int micron_ecc_get_status(struct  
> > spinand_device *spinand,  
> > >  	return -EINVAL;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static const struct spinand_info micron_spinand_table[] = {
> > > -	SPINAND_INFO("MT29F2G01ABAGD", 0x24,
> > > -		     NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 128, 64, 2048, 40, 2, 1, 1),
> > > -		     NAND_ECCREQ(8, 512),
> > > -		     SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants,
> > > -					      &write_cache_variants,
> > > -					      &update_cache_variants),
> > > -		     0,
> > > -		     SPINAND_ECCINFO(&micron_ooblayout_ops,
> > > -				     micron_ecc_get_status)),
> > > -};
> > > -  
> > 
> > I don't know if it is wise to drop this structure.
> >   
> > >  static int micron_spinand_detect(struct spinand_device *spinand)
> > >  {
> > > +	const struct spi_mem_op *op;
> > >  	u8 *id = spinand->id.data;
> > > -	int ret;
> > >
> > >  	/*
> > >  	 * Micron SPI NAND read ID need a dummy byte,
> > > @@ -114,16 +102,55 @@ static int micron_spinand_detect(struct  
> > spinand_device *spinand)  
> > >  	if (id[1] != SPINAND_MFR_MICRON)
> > >  		return 0;
> > >
> > > -	ret = spinand_match_and_init(spinand, micron_spinand_table,
> > > -				     ARRAY_SIZE(micron_spinand_table),  
> > id[2]);
> > 
> > I am not sure this is the right solution. I would keep this call and
> > overwrite what you need to overwrite with the fixup hook.
> >   
> 
> Then, I will have dummy structure like below.
> 
> static const struct spinand_info micron_spinand_table[] = {                      
>         SPINAND_INFO(NULL, 0,                                                                    
>                      NAND_MEMORG(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0),           
>                      NAND_ECCREQ(0, 0),                                                                       
>                      SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants,              
>                                               &write_cache_variants,             
>                                               &update_cache_variants),           
>                      0,                                                                                         
>                      SPINAND_ECCINFO(&micron_ooblayout_ops,                      
>                                      micron_ecc_get_status)),                    
> };                                    
> 
> Let me know if you are thinking for different approach.
> 

Thanks,
MiquÃl