Re: [v2 PATCH -mm] mm: account deferred split THPs into MemAvailable

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 02:09:23PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 27-08-19 14:01:56, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 8/27/19 1:02 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 08:01:39AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > >> On Mon 26-08-19 16:15:38, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Unmapped completely pages will be freed with current code. Deferred split
> > >>> only applies to partly mapped THPs: at least on 4k of the THP is still
> > >>> mapped somewhere.
> > >>
> > >> Hmm, I am probably misreading the code but at least current Linus' tree
> > >> reads page_remove_rmap -> [page_remove_anon_compound_rmap ->\ deferred_split_huge_page even
> > >> for fully mapped THP.
> > > 
> > > Well, you read correctly, but it was not intended. I screwed it up at some
> > > point.
> > > 
> > > See the patch below. It should make it work as intened.
> > > 
> > > It's not bug as such, but inefficientcy. We add page to the queue where
> > > it's not needed.
> > 
> > But that adding to queue doesn't affect whether the page will be freed
> > immediately if there are no more partial mappings, right? I don't see
> > deferred_split_huge_page() pinning the page.
> > So your patch wouldn't make THPs freed immediately in cases where they
> > haven't been freed before immediately, it just fixes a minor
> > inefficiency with queue manipulation?
> 
> Ohh, right. I can see that in free_transhuge_page now. So fully mapped
> THPs really do not matter and what I have considered an odd case is
> really happening more often.
> 
> That being said this will not help at all for what Yang Shi is seeing
> and we need a more proactive deferred splitting as I've mentioned
> earlier.

It was not intended to fix the issue. It's fix for current logic. I'm
playing with the work approach now.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov