Re: [PATCH 5/7] bcm-vk: add bcm_vk UAPI
From: Kieran Bingham
Date: Tue Aug 27 2019 - 10:49:51 EST
Hi Scott,
On 22/08/2019 20:24, Scott Branden wrote:
> Add user space api for bcm-vk driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/misc/bcm_vk.h | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/misc/bcm_vk.h
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/misc/bcm_vk.h b/include/uapi/linux/misc/bcm_vk.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..df7dfd7f0702
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/misc/bcm_vk.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) */
> +/*
> + * Copyright(c) 2018 Broadcom
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __UAPI_LINUX_MISC_BCM_VK_H
> +#define __UAPI_LINUX_MISC_BCM_VK_H
> +
> +#include <linux/ioctl.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct vk_metadata {
> + /* struct version, always backwards compatible */
> + __u32 version;
> +
> + /* Version 0 fields */
> + __u32 card_status;
> +#define VK_CARD_STATUS_FASTBOOT_READY BIT(0)
> +#define VK_CARD_STATUS_FWLOADER_READY BIT(1)
> +
> + __u32 firmware_version;
> + __u32 fw_status;
> + /* End version 0 fields */
> +
> + __u64 reserved[14];
> + /* Total of 16*u64 for all versions */
> +};
> +
> +struct vk_image {
> + __u32 type; /* Type of image */
> +#define VK_IMAGE_TYPE_BOOT1 1 /* 1st stage (load to SRAM) */
> +#define VK_IMAGE_TYPE_BOOT2 2 /* 2nd stage (load to DDR) */
> + char filename[64]; /* Filename of image */
> +};
> +
> +/* default firmware images names */
> +#define VK_BOOT1_DEF_FILENAME "vk-boot1.bin"
> +#define VK_BOOT2_DEF_FILENAME "vk-boot2.bin"
> +
> +struct vk_access {
> + __u8 barno; /* BAR number to use */
> + __u8 type; /* Type of access */
> +#define VK_ACCESS_READ 0
> +#define VK_ACCESS_WRITE 1
> + __u32 len; /* length of data */
> + __u64 offset; /* offset in BAR */
> + __u32 *data; /* where to read/write data to */
> +};
> +
> +struct vk_reset {
> + __u32 arg1;
> + __u32 arg2;
> +};
> +
> +#define VK_MAGIC 0x5E
> +
> +/* Get metadata from Valkyrie (firmware version, card status, etc) */
> +#define VK_IOCTL_GET_METADATA _IOR(VK_MAGIC, 0x1, struct vk_metadata)
> +
> +/* Load image to Valkyrie */
> +#define VK_IOCTL_LOAD_IMAGE _IOW(VK_MAGIC, 0x2, struct vk_image)
> +
> +/* Read data from Valkyrie */
> +#define VK_IOCTL_ACCESS_BAR _IOWR(VK_MAGIC, 0x3, struct vk_access)
> +
> +/* Send Reset to Valkyrie */
> +#define VK_IOCTL_RESET _IOW(VK_MAGIC, 0x4, struct vk_reset)
It sounds a bit like the valkyrie is a generic asynchronous coprocessor,
does it merit using the remoteproc interfaces to control it ?
Or is it really just a single purpose cell doing video operations ?
--
Kieran
> +
> +/*
> + * message block - basic unit in the message where a message's size is always
> + * N x sizeof(basic_block)
> + */
> +struct vk_msg_blk {
> + __u8 function_id;
> +#define VK_FID_TRANS_BUF 5
> +#define VK_FID_SHUTDOWN 8
> + __u8 size;
> + __u16 queue_id:4;
> + __u16 msg_id:12;
> + __u32 context_id;
> + __u32 args[2];
> +#define VK_CMD_PLANES_MASK 0x000F /* number of planes to up/download */
> +#define VK_CMD_UPLOAD 0x0400 /* memory transfer to vk */
> +#define VK_CMD_DOWNLOAD 0x0500 /* memory transfer from vk */
> +#define VK_CMD_MASK 0x0F00 /* command mask */
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* __UAPI_LINUX_MISC_BCM_VK_H */
>
--
Regards
--
Kieran