Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 27 (kunit)

[Brendan Higgins]

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:29 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 8/27/19 2:05 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20190826:
> >
>
> on i386:
> # CONFIG_PRINTK is not set
>
>
> ../kunit/test.c: In function âkunit_vprintk_emitâ:
> ../kunit/test.c:21:9: error: implicit declaration of function âvprintk_emitâ; did you mean âvprintkâ? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   return vprintk_emit(0, level, NULL, 0, fmt, args);
>          ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>          vprintk

Ooops, it never occurred to me to test the situation where I wouldn't
be able to see test results :-)

It seems to me that the right thing to do here is to do what
dev_printk and friends do and to ifdef this out if CONFIG_PRINTK is
unavailable. Does that seem reasonable?

Also, do you want me to resend my patches with the fix or do you want
me to send a new patch with this fix? (Sorry for the newbie question.)

Thanks!