Re: [PATCH 04/13] irqchip: Add driver for Loongson-3 I/O interrupt controller

[Marc Zyngier]

On 27/08/2019 09:52, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> This controller appeared on Loongson-3 family of chips as the primary
> package interrupt source.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig          |   9 ++
>  drivers/irqchip/Makefile         |   1 +
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-ls3-iointc.c | 216 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-ls3-iointc.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 80e10f4e213a..8d9eac5fd4a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -471,6 +471,15 @@ config TI_SCI_INTA_IRQCHIP
>  	  If you wish to use interrupt aggregator irq resources managed by the
>  	  TI System Controller, say Y here. Otherwise, say N.
>  
> +config LS3_IOINTC
> +	bool "Loongson3 I/O Interrupt Controller"
> +	depends on MACH_LOONGSON64
> +	default y
> +	select IRQ_DOMAIN
> +	select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> +	help
> +	  Support for the Loongson-3 I/O Interrupt Controller.
> +
>  endmenu
>  
>  config SIFIVE_PLIC
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index 8d0fcec6ab23..49ecb8d38138 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -102,3 +102,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MADERA_IRQ)		+= irq-madera.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_LS1X_IRQ)			+= irq-ls1x.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SCI_INTR_IRQCHIP)	+= irq-ti-sci-intr.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SCI_INTA_IRQCHIP)	+= irq-ti-sci-inta.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_LS3_IOINTC)			+= irq-ls3-iointc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls3-iointc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls3-iointc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1fc3c41c57d9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls3-iointc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + *  Copyright (C) 2019, Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *  Loongson-3 IOINTC IRQ support
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/ioport.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/smp.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +
> +
> +#define LS3_CHIP_IRQ	32
> +
> +#define LS3_INTC_CHIP_START	0x20
> +
> +#define LS3_REG_INTC_STATUS	0x00
> +#define LS3_REG_INTC_EN_STATUS	0x04
> +#define LS3_REG_INTC_ENABLE	0x08
> +#define LS3_REG_INTC_DISABLE	0x0c
> +#define LS3_REG_INTC_POL	0x10
> +#define LS3_REG_INTC_EDGE	0x18
> +
> +#define LS3_MAP_CORE_INT(x, y)	(u8)(BIT(x) | (BIT(y) << 4))
> +
> +
> +struct ls3_iointc_priv {
> +	struct irq_domain	*domain;
> +	void __iomem		*intc_base;
> +};
> +
> +
> +static void ls3_io_chained_handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +	struct ls3_iointc_priv *priv = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> +	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +	u32 pending;
> +
> +	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> +	pending = readl(priv->intc_base + LS3_REG_INTC_EN_STATUS) &
> +		readl(priv->intc_base + LS3_REG_INTC_STATUS);

Reading the enabled status from the HW on each interrupt? I'm sure
that's pretty cheap...

> +
> +	if (!pending)
> +		spurious_interrupt();
> +
> +	while (pending) {
> +		int bit = __ffs(pending);
> +
> +		generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(priv->domain, bit));
> +		pending &= ~BIT(bit);
> +	}
> +
> +	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void ls_intc_set_bit(struct irq_chip_generic *gc,
> +							unsigned int offset,
> +							u32 mask, bool set)
> +{
> +	if (set)
> +		writel(readl(gc->reg_base + offset) | mask,
> +		gc->reg_base + offset);

Please correctly align the second line.

> +	else
> +		writel(readl(gc->reg_base + offset) & ~mask,
> +		gc->reg_base + offset);
> +}

Have you tried this on a SMP system? A RMW without locking is unlikely
to go down very well.

> +
> +static int ls_intc_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
> +{
> +	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +	u32 mask = data->mask;
> +
> +	switch (type) {
> +	case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> +		ls_intc_set_bit(gc, LS3_REG_INTC_EDGE, mask, false);
> +		ls_intc_set_bit(gc, LS3_REG_INTC_POL, mask, true);
> +		break;
> +	case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> +		ls_intc_set_bit(gc, LS3_REG_INTC_EDGE, mask, false);
> +		ls_intc_set_bit(gc, LS3_REG_INTC_POL, mask, false);
> +		break;
> +	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> +		ls_intc_set_bit(gc, LS3_REG_INTC_EDGE, mask, true);
> +		ls_intc_set_bit(gc, LS3_REG_INTC_POL, mask, true);
> +		break;
> +	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> +		ls_intc_set_bit(gc, LS3_REG_INTC_EDGE, mask, true);
> +		ls_intc_set_bit(gc, LS3_REG_INTC_POL, mask, false);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	irqd_set_trigger_type(data, type);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int __init ls3_iointc_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> +				       struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> +	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
> +	struct irq_chip_type *ct;
> +	struct ls3_iointc_priv *priv;
> +	int parent_irq, err = 0;
> +	int core = cpu_logical_map(smp_processor_id());

Are you guaranteed to be in a non-preemptible section here?

> +	int ip = 0;
> +	int i;
> +	const u32 *map_ip, *map_core;
> +
> +	priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	priv->intc_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
> +	if (!priv->intc_base) {
> +		err = -ENODEV;
> +		goto out_free_priv;
> +	}
> +
> +	map_ip = of_get_property(node, "loongson,map-ip", NULL);
> +	if (!map_ip)
> +		goto no_ip;
> +	else if ((*map_ip) > 5)
> +		pr_err("* %pOF loongson,map-ip is invalid\n", node);
> +	else
> +		ip = (*map_ip);

What is this "ip"?

> +no_ip:
> +
> +	/* If this property does not exist or invalid,
> +	 * we map all IRQs to bootcore.
> +	 */

Comment format.

> +	map_core = of_get_property(node, "loongson,map-core", NULL);
> +	if (!map_core)
> +		goto no_core;
> +	else if ((*map_core) > 3)
> +		pr_err("* %pOF loongson,map-core is invalid\n", node);
> +	else
> +		core = (*map_core);
> +no_core:
> +
> +	parent_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> +	if (!parent_irq) {
> +		pr_err("ls3-iointc: unable to get parent irq\n");
> +		err =  -ENODEV;
> +		goto out_iounmap;
> +	}
> +	/* Set up an IRQ domain */
> +	priv->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, 32, &irq_generic_chip_ops,
> +					     NULL);
> +	if (!priv->domain) {
> +		pr_err("ls3-iointc: cannot add IRQ domain\n");
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out_iounmap;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(priv->domain, 32, 1,
> +		node->full_name, handle_level_irq,
> +		IRQ_NOPROBE, 0, 0);
> +	if (err) {
> +		pr_err("ls3-iointc: unable to register IRQ domain\n");
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out_free_domain;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Q: Why don't we set IRQ affinity by these registers?
> +	 * A: Hardware IRQ delivery is seriously broken,
> +	 *    so we map all IRQs to a fixed core.
> +	 */
> +	pr_info("ls3-iointc: Mapping All ls3-iointc IRQ to core %d, IP %d\n", core, ip);
> +	for (i = 0; i < LS3_CHIP_IRQ; i++)
> +		writeb(LS3_MAP_CORE_INT(core, ip), priv->intc_base + 0x1 * i);

This doesn't make much sense. If this is a chained irqchip, all
interrupts end-up on a single CPU (the one that handle the parent IRQ).
So how comes there is even a choice of picking a target CPU?

Also, you still need to define a set_affinity() callback, even if it
returns -EINVAL.

> +	priv->intc_base += LS3_INTC_CHIP_START;
> +
> +	/* Disable all IRQs */
> +	writel(0xffffffff, priv->intc_base + LS3_REG_INTC_DISABLE);
> +	/* Set to level triggered */
> +	writel(0x0, priv->intc_base + LS3_REG_INTC_EDGE);
> +
> +	gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(priv->domain, 0);
> +	gc->reg_base = priv->intc_base;
> +	gc->domain = priv->domain;
> +
> +	ct = gc->chip_types;
> +	ct->regs.enable = LS3_REG_INTC_ENABLE;
> +	ct->regs.disable = LS3_REG_INTC_DISABLE;
> +	ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_unmask_enable_reg;
> +	ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_disable_reg;
> +	ct->chip.irq_mask_ack = irq_gc_mask_disable_reg;
> +	ct->chip.irq_set_type = ls_intc_set_type;
> +
> +	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(parent_irq,
> +		ls3_io_chained_handle_irq, priv);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +out_free_domain:
> +	irq_domain_remove(priv->domain);
> +out_iounmap:
> +	iounmap(priv->intc_base);
> +out_free_priv:
> +	kfree(priv);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ls3_iointc, "loongson,ls3-iointc", ls3_iointc_of_init);
> 

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny...