Re: [PATCH] x86/cpufeature: explicit comments for duplicate macro

[Borislav Petkov]

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 02:11:00PM +0800, Cao jin wrote:

For the future:

> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpufeature: explicit comments for duplicate macro

your subject needs to have a verb and start with a capital letter after
the subsystem/path prefix. In this case, something like this, for
example:

Subject: [PATCH] x86/cpufeature: Explain the macro duplication

> Help people to understand the author's intent of apparent duplication of
> BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != n), which is hard to detect by eyes.
> 
> CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Tried my best to describe it accurately, in case of any inaccuracy, feel
> free to rephrase.

Yap, I fixed it up.

Thanks!

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.