Re: [PATCH v2] kunit: fix failure to build without printk

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (08/28/19 02:31), Brendan Higgins wrote:
[..]
> Previously KUnit assumed that printk would always be present, which is
> not a valid assumption to make. Fix that by removing call to
> vprintk_emit, and calling printk directly.
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/0352fae9-564f-4a97-715a-fabe016259df@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>

[..]

> -static void kunit_vprintk(const struct kunit *test,
> -			  const char *level,
> -			  struct va_format *vaf)
> -{
> -	kunit_printk_emit(level[1] - '0', "\t# %s: %pV", test->name, vaf);
> -}

This patch looks good to me. I like the removal of recursive
vsprintf() (%pV).

	-ss