Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: gpio-pca953x.c: Correct type of reg_direction

From: Bartosz Golaszewski
Date: Wed Aug 28 2019 - 08:17:12 EST


År., 28 sie 2019 o 13:13 David Jander <david@xxxxxxxxxxx> napisaÅ(a):
>
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:56:28 +0200
> Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > År., 28 sie 2019 o 10:38 Bartosz Golaszewski
> > <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> napisaÅ(a):
> > >
> > > wt., 27 sie 2019 o 08:46 David Jander <david@xxxxxxxxxxx> napisaÅ(a):
> > > >
> > > > The type of reg_direction needs to match the type of the regmap, which is
> > > > u8.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: David Jander <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 6 +++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> > > > index 378b206d2dc9..30072a570bc2 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> > > > @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static void pca953x_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *d)
> > > > u8 new_irqs;
> > > > int level, i;
> > > > u8 invert_irq_mask[MAX_BANK];
> > > > - int reg_direction[MAX_BANK];
> > > > + u8 reg_direction[MAX_BANK];
> > > >
> > > > regmap_bulk_read(chip->regmap, chip->regs->direction, reg_direction,
> > > > NBANK(chip));
> > > > @@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ static bool pca953x_irq_pending(struct pca953x_chip *chip, u8 *pending)
> > > > bool pending_seen = false;
> > > > bool trigger_seen = false;
> > > > u8 trigger[MAX_BANK];
> > > > - int reg_direction[MAX_BANK];
> > > > + u8 reg_direction[MAX_BANK];
> > > > int ret, i;
> > > >
> > > > if (chip->driver_data & PCA_PCAL) {
> > > > @@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ static int pca953x_irq_setup(struct pca953x_chip *chip,
> > > > {
> > > > struct i2c_client *client = chip->client;
> > > > struct irq_chip *irq_chip = &chip->irq_chip;
> > > > - int reg_direction[MAX_BANK];
> > > > + u8 reg_direction[MAX_BANK];
> > > > int ret, i;
> > > >
> > > > if (!client->irq)
> > > > --
> > > > 2.19.1
> > > >
> > >
> > > Applied for v5.4.
> >
> > Actually the second patch depends on the first one, so moved it over to fixes.
>
> Btw, they are both bugfixes, IMHO it would be valuable to have them in 5.3rc
> if possible... there is some severe breakage there right now.
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> David Jander
>

Yes, that's why I said I moved it to fixes.

Bart