Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: always build llseek.

[Eric W. Biederman]

ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) writes:

> Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> 64bit !COMPAT does not build because the llseek syscall is in the
>> tables.
>
> Do I read this right you have a 128 bit offset to llseek on ppc64?
>
> Looking at the signature it does not appear to make sense to build this
> function on any 64bit platform.
>
> Perhaps the proper fix to to take llseek out of your syscall tables?

Sorry I missed seeing the 2 newer version of the patchset in my inbox
it seems you have already made the change I am suggesting.

Never mind.

Eric