Re: [PATCH v2] leds: ti-lmu-common: Fix coccinelle issue in TI LMU

From: Jacek Anaszewski
Date: Wed Aug 28 2019 - 16:27:33 EST


Hi Dan,

Thank you for the update.

On 8/28/19 5:22 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Fix the coccinelle issues found in the TI LMU common code
>
> drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c:97:20-29: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: ramp_down < 0
> drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c:97:5-12: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: ramp_up < 0
>
> Fixes: f717460ba4d7 ("leds: TI LMU: Add common code for TI LMU devices")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c | 15 ++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c b/drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c
> index adc7293004f1..e294a0b097e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c
> @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@
>
> #include <linux/leds-ti-lmu-common.h>
>
> -const static int ramp_table[16] = {2048, 262000, 524000, 1049000, 2090000,
> - 4194000, 8389000, 16780000, 33550000, 41940000,
> - 50330000, 58720000, 67110000, 83880000,
> - 100660000, 117440000};
> +const static unsigned int ramp_table[16] = {2048, 262000, 524000, 1049000,
> + 2090000, 4194000, 8389000, 16780000, 33550000,
> + 41940000, 50330000, 58720000, 67110000,
> + 83880000, 100660000, 117440000};
>
> static int ti_lmu_common_update_brightness(struct ti_lmu_bank *lmu_bank,
> int brightness)
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ int ti_lmu_common_set_brightness(struct ti_lmu_bank *lmu_bank, int brightness)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ti_lmu_common_set_brightness);
>
> -static int ti_lmu_common_convert_ramp_to_index(unsigned int usec)
> +static unsigned int ti_lmu_common_convert_ramp_to_index(unsigned int usec)
> {
> int size = ARRAY_SIZE(ramp_table);
> int i;
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static int ti_lmu_common_convert_ramp_to_index(unsigned int usec)
> }
> }
>
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int ti_lmu_common_set_ramp(struct ti_lmu_bank *lmu_bank)
> @@ -94,9 +94,6 @@ int ti_lmu_common_set_ramp(struct ti_lmu_bank *lmu_bank)
> ramp_down = ti_lmu_common_convert_ramp_to_index(lmu_bank->ramp_down_usec);
> }
>
> - if (ramp_up < 0 || ramp_down < 0)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> ramp = (ramp_up << 4) | ramp_down;
>
> return regmap_write(regmap, lmu_bank->runtime_ramp_reg, ramp);
>

I've applied the patch but amended SHA1 in the Fixes tag - in mainline
it is 3fce8e1eb994.

--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski